Subscribe to EDN

Keithley & TEGAM on measuring nanoamperes

May 1, 2007

I just got a nice note from John Tucker, lead marketing engineer –nanotechnology, research and education over at Keithley Instruments. His title shows what a cool company Keithley is. I mentioned them before when I gave a shout out to Keithley’s Low Level Measurement handbook in this blog. He has just read my latest article Measuring Nanoamperes, and John pointed out that the Keithley 2400 is not really an electrometer as I implied in the article. He writes:

I would like to complement you on your recently published article "Measuring Nanoamperes". I had the chance to read this on my flight down to Atlanta today. It was enjoyable reading.

I do want to point out that the model number referring to the Keithley Electrometer is incorrect. The 2400 is a SourceMeter and not an electrometer. The 2400 is as you mention more of a source-measure unit. I believe that the model that should have appeared for the electrometer should have been our Model 6157A. You might want to verify this with Paul Grohe. The 6517A is designed to measure femtoamps where the 2400 does not have that low of a current measurement range.

He is right of course— in my defense I want to point out that the 2400 SourceMeter is still a darn good instrument and my pals at the semiconductor companies like it since they can force a current as well as measure one.

I also got a nice note from Andy Brush, the CEO of TEGAM, a cool company in it’s own right, who points out:

Thanks for the article on sensitive measurements. One nit to pick: While the Keithley model 2400 can indeed resolve better than nanoamperes, it's poor (for Keithley) current measurement capability does not earn it the title of "Electrometer"… 2400 is a SourceMeter. The really interesting model (and the one Adam Daire wrote about in reference #7) is the Model 6430 preamplified electrometer. That unit can resolve attoamperes, and probably remains the top DC low-current instrument available.

Thanks to both these gents for pointing out that there are instruments beyond nanoamperes. Attoamperes. Wow.

Posted by Paul Rako on May 1, 2007 | Comments (1)

May 2, 2007
In response to: Keithley & TEGAM on measuring nanoamperes
Rick Nelson commented:

Paul?I guess I thought I knew what an electrometer was until I read your post. I?ve tried to outline the history of the instrument at ?Taking the Measure? (www.tmworld.com/blogs) and welcome comments over there. Thanks for the post?and the measuring nanoamps article.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows