Subscribe to EDN

Solar plane with lithium-sulfur batteries

August 25, 2008

The staid and analytical BBC has an article about a solar-powered airplane that uses lithium-sulfur batteries to stay aloft at 60,000 feet for three days. The video is pretty good, actually informative rather then TV-newscaster fluff. Pretty cool, I had not seen LiS batteries before, but the little factual material I can find on them points out the 60 charge cycles you get out of them before they are junk. The datasheet for the batteries in the plane (pdf) shows that most of the energy comes out a 2.1 volts, which means it will need a buck-boost converter for consumer products, and the –20 C rating means it will have a hard time in cars, that need to go down to –40 C. If they do have twice the energy density of lithium polymer that is really something, at least if they are talking about gravimetric energy density, volumetric energy density is not so important in portable applications. The datasheet shows 350 Wh/kg, which is better than the 150 to 190 that you get from li-cobalt. Of course every thinkgeek type of entry on the web has the typical 3 or 4 clueless fanboyz saying "Dell should adopt this right now". The article mentions Sion Corporation as the battery manufacturer, and I have seen reference to Saft (pdf) although it was not clear if Saft was proposing a primary or secondary (rechargeable) battery. As with most batteries LiSu is supposed to be lousy at cold, but the BBC article points out the plane was operating at –70 C, so that makes this achievement even more remarkable.

What also surprised me was the solar plane’s use of amorphous silicon solar cells, since they would have less output that crystalline cells, Sunpower is bragging abut 22% efficient crystalline cells, and cell that are based on the III-V materials like gallium arsinide can do even better since it is a direct bandgap semiconductor, unlike silicon. I suspect that they used amorphous cells since it could be bent around the airfoil of the wing. This is a remarkable engineering achievement, I am one of those guys that think an ounce of trial is worth a pound of press releases. I do know better than to think we will all be running our cars and laptops off LiSu anytime soon, when it comes to technology, I don’t think it is real until I can find it in the Digi-Key catalog.

Posted by Paul Rako on August 25, 2008 | Comments (6)

May 1, 2009
In response to: Solar plane with lithium-sulfur batteries
Bad credit Loans commented:

I found lots of interesting information on www.edn.com. The post was professionally written and I feel like the author has extensive knowledge in the subject. www.edn.com keep it that way.


September 3, 2008
In response to: Solar plane with lithium-sulfur batteries
Alan R. Weiss commented:

Lithium Phosphate batteries (i.e. like those from Valence Technologies in Austin, Texas) are far safer and have good duty cycle capabilities. They are much safer than standard lithium ion (LiOn) batteries. Disclaimer: my company, Synchromesh Computing, writes battery management, configuration, and control software for Valence. We do have a lot of experience with them, and they''re a really good advance in technology.


August 28, 2008
In response to: Solar plane with lithium-sulfur batteries
Tim G commented:

McGraw-Hill Handbook of Batteries is the bible for battery people.


August 28, 2008
In response to: Solar plane with lithium-sulfur batteries
Paul Rako commented:

Sorry to be unclear Larry, putting rechargeable cells in series is a real nightmare-- witness the Sony laptops catching fire. You have to balance the cell charging, which means you need multiple precision chargers. You are right that it is done, heck I have done it myself, but in the context of handheld devices like cell phones and MP3 players, a single cell is the holy grail of power system design. As for Quent, you can start off at Margery Conner''s blog about solar cells: www.edn.com/blog/1470000147/post/1040031904.html I suspect your best bet is searching wikipedia-- do you need rechargeable batteries? There are two popular ones, nickel metal hydride and lithium ion. And don''t forget lead acid, the old workhorse. It all depends on your application. Searching the web should get you started, both technologies are changing so fast books are being obsoleted.


August 26, 2008
In response to: Solar plane with lithium-sulfur batteries
Quent commented:

I read this article because I am starting two project, one needs batteries and the other needs solar cells. I have used batteries before for projects. But with those projects almost any consumer battery would work. This time I need to engineer them. Dose anybody know of a good book on battery types, their pro and cons, that is not based on my brand battery is best. With the other project, I need to use solar cells and I have never tried using them before. So the same type of question, dose anyone know of a good book on solar cell basics and design technique? Thanks for the help!


August 26, 2008
In response to: Solar plane with lithium-sulfur batteries
Richard C commented:

You mean like Sony Li-Ion?

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows