Subscribe to EDN

Sprint, at&t, T-Mobile, Verizon; which is the best?

August 28, 2008

EDN just decided that we are not going to use at&t cell phone service anymore. I don’t know if this is because at&t is dropping their TDMA phone system, or they charge too much, or just corporate whimsy. The nice thing is we get to keep our old numbers. So the phone department or IT or whoever worries about this wants us all to pick an alternative serves, T-Mobile, Sprint or Verizon. I asked all my local friends what they thought and was depressed at how may people told me to stick with at&t. One thing about my choice different than most people is I don’t care about the plan cost because I don’t pay and I don’t care about text messaging because I refuse to poke at a little tiny box to send a message to someone I could just as easily call up. I know, I’m a dinosaur. Of my friends that had an opinion, the ones that did not go for at&t seemed to prefer Verizon. My buddy Dave said:

My brother in law is a road warrior, and swears by Verizon. Their evdo data is better than Tmo, though Tmo is promising 3G with higher data rates soon (UMTS). I have tmo and generally find their service acceptable, but the slow data rate is a bummer. Across the country, CDMA has better coverage. In Europe, GSM wins, but if you go there, just buy a second used, unlocked quad band gsm phone and get prepaid sim at the supermarket.

Analog guru Paul Grohe responded:

They are all evil. Verizon modifies (cripples) the phone OS and charges you to use features the phone manufacturer originally included (GPS, Bluetooth file transfer, USB file transfers, phonebook backup, photo downloads, etc). Though a few hacks can get most of them back. But if you just want a voice-only telephone, they are fine. I had 5 solid bars with AT&T TDMA at home (I can SEE the tower from by back yard), whereas Verizon is one bar (but still works) and Sprint is driveway-only reception. If you live in a stucco house, or stray outside the urban areas, forget Sprint. On our drive down to LA (101/1 scenic route), my Verizon phone had bars the whole way, whereas my fathers Sprint phone was dropping in-and-out. But everywhere else, I have had no problems with Verizon reception. Verizon and Sprint uses 800/1.9GHz CDMA - so the signal penetrates pretty well. AT&T is moving from 800 TDMA to 800M/1.9G GSM. Note that AT&T has already discontinued TDMA phones. T-Mobile sells $40 all-you-can-eat bucket plans - so that means they will be overloaded by teenagers and other yakkers in a crowded area. The downtown concerts are a good test of capacity. Billing-wise - I have had no problems with Verizon. I think the second least evil would be Verizon, with Sprint and T-Mobile in a tie for third. Just have your buddies with a phone on each system do a "site survey" with their phone and see how the reception is in the areas you frequent the most. T-Mobile’s "Coverage Check" says you will get 3 bars at home (outside). Just be sure you get a multi-band phone (800/1.9). If you are going to travel internationally, get a multi-band GSM "world-phone" with a SIM card.

In addition Paul sent a link to a great site that explains the cell phone differences and focuses on which service is best in the SF bay area. It may be a little outdated but it taught me a lot about cell phones, a device I would not own if EDN did not require it. That site also led me to this history site about wireless and cell phones, something former editor and electronics history buff Steve Leibson is sure to enjoy.

Since I don’t even like cell phones I am also loathe to get a Blackberry or Trio, but most of my buddies seem to think the Apple phone is best for web browsing and the Blackberry is best to handle email. And everybody tells me to stay away from any device run with a Microsoft OS. My buddy with a Microsoft PDA says it constantly crashes, and my buddy Tim over at Linear Tech has had nothing but problems once he allowed his Treo to sync to his Outlook email program. You can’t even have Microsoft drive by your stuff without it causing crashes.

So add your two cents—which service and which phone—I would love to hear about that, since I do not even know what phone I well get now that I have chosen Verizon.

Posted by Paul Rako on August 28, 2008 | Comments (10)

October 23, 2008
In response to: Sprint, at&t, T-Mobile, Verizon; which is the best?
LiL SiS commented:

at&t is not better than Verizon because they can not get network anywhere and Verizon does


October 4, 2008
In response to: Sprint, at&t, T-Mobile, Verizon; which is the best?
Eric commented:

I am a truck driver who drives through mountains daily and have used all major carriers. Sprint is the only one that does not lose service when I go through the mountains and countryside. The customer service is the worst but I put up with it because of their far superior coverage area. Also Sprints mobile web works in roam mode while Verizons doesnt and since I use it a lot thats a big plus for me.


September 2, 2008
In response to: Sprint, at&t, T-Mobile, Verizon; which is the best?
lcsjk commented:

I have T-Mobile and a friend has Verizon and my other family plan T-mobile. The cheap Nokia phone (wal-mart)has much better voice quality and sensitivity than the Verizon Non-Nokia phone. I also use a Motorola phone on the T-mobile plan and even in the same location, the voice quality is really bad; almost unintelligible, but Nokia is good. My advice is to research not only the carrier, but also make sure the phone is good quality. Coverage is important, but only if you can tell what the people are saying. voice quality is really bad


September 2, 2008
In response to: Sprint, at&t, T-Mobile, Verizon; which is the best?
lcsjk commented:

I have T-Mobile and a friend has Verizon and my other family plan T-mobile. The cheap Nokia phone (wal-mart)has much better voice quality and sensitivity than the Verizon Non-Nokia phone. I also use a Motorola phone on the T-mobile plan and even in the same location, the voice quality is really bad


August 28, 2008
In response to: Sprint, at&t, T-Mobile, Verizon; which is the best?
Jonathan Williams commented:

Back in 2004, we took the family on an 11,000 mile coast-to-coast and back again cross-country trip. I was pleasantly surprised at Verizon's coverage. We were rarely without signal, even in some very remote areas of this country. Seems like a few places in Wyoming and Idaho, we lost our signals, but by and large, we were able to stay connected. It sucks they are taking away the ability to use the phone as a modem, instead trying to rope you into an expensive data plan. The earlier Samsung phones broke at the hinges and were complete crap but the LG phones seem to be OK. Sound quality bites. No problem with sound levels, static or noise, it's just intelligibility sucks. I should do some transmission analysis to see what it is they are doing to make it impossible to discern the words. Wasn't digital supposed to be clearer??


August 28, 2008
In response to: Sprint, at&t, T-Mobile, Verizon; which is the best?
CodeWarrior1241 commented:

I agree that CDMA coverage is best for North America. I do just as your buddy does - keep an old motorola flipphone for europe. Sprint gives free roaming on the Verizon network, and since they use the same frequencies/modulation, voice calls are interchangeable. By forcing the phone to roam when one is away from urban areas, Sprint phones will work great on the Verizon coverage. The problem with Verizon is that their phones are typically 6 months to a year older than Sprint's. If you don't care about that - go with Verizon.


August 28, 2008
In response to: Sprint, at&t, T-Mobile, Verizon; which is the best?
nwz commented:

Over the last 10 years I have tried Sprint, Alltel, T-Mobile and then Alltel again. Have never been willing to try Verizon, either their plans were too expensive, or the phones were unappealing (or both). I get the willies anytime I ever interact with AT&T. I can never quite shake the feeling that they're somehow connected with the devil, but alas, for somethings I just don't have a choice. (My thoughts have been somewhat re-inforced by the number of times I have had issues with their service, billing or otherwise). Sprint was more or less fine while I had it, but that was a number of years ago. With Tmobile we had reception issues. I've been happiest with, and had both the best coverage and service from Alltel. I realize they are in the process of being devoured by Verizon, but for now they are head and shoulders above the rest as far as I can tell.


August 28, 2008
In response to: Sprint, at&t, T-Mobile, Verizon; which is the best?
T Goober Pea commented:

My Sprint plan has auto-roaming, which uses the established lines of Verizon, ATT, or other. This is a no-cost item included in my package, regardless of how often I am roaming. So, wherever Verizon is, I can use my Sprint. At my house, I only have Verizon cell service and my Sprint is virtually always using the Verizon system.


August 28, 2008
In response to: Sprint, at&t, T-Mobile, Verizon; which is the best?
Jim commented:

I have verizon and my wife has AT&T (she wanted an Iphone). 99% of the time I have better reception than she does. Verizon has the best coverage in terms of the network in my opinion. Granted I live near and spend a fair amount of time in the mountains (idaho and montana). Service has been great. The draw back for verizon is as stated above, they ruin the user interface and have a subpar selection of phones. Still for me, the network coverage is priority one, verizon is still my choice.


August 28, 2008
In response to: Sprint, at&t, T-Mobile, Verizon; which is the best?
Savage3C commented:

Have had Verison for last 10 years. Latest mobile phone is a flip open full querty keyboard (LG enV). does voice, text, email, and location nicely. Battery life typically two days or more between charges. Don''t be a dinosaur, come into the 21st century. Get one for your wife and kids. great for keeping in touch.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows