Subscribe to EDN

Will the real ESL market stand up? A nod to Gary and Lucio

October 25, 2006

Hey folks, John Cooley just posted a new piece on Deepchip.com regarding market research firm Gartner folding Gary's Smith's EDA analyst group. It's not surprising to note that most folks in Cooley's piece say they will miss Gary's group. There are a few that say essentially good riddance and that Gary's been too focused on ESL, which has yet to really step up as a formidable EDA market—in fact, with the recent news of Mentor acquiring Summit, it may be consolidating.

I've always took it that Gary was a big advocate of ESL as a new avenue of growth for EDA but I think he gave considerable play to the DFM space as well as traditional EDA market segments.

ESL's a rough market though—There aren't that many architects out there and if you're trying to sell ESL tools to software developers, they will freak out when you show them the price tag for EDA tools. Software and embedded designers are used to low to no cost software, so seemingly to be effective, EDA vendors have to be willing to sell a whole lot of software at a low price point and build up a massive support staff to support the many users or they have to focus on selling really expensive tools to the hundreds of architects out there to make R&D worthwhile.

But there is also a third way to do it and that's basically sell ESL as a giant bundled service: software for hardware software co-design, virtual platform development and model building.

That's what Synopsys is going to do anyway and it's all built around the Virtio acquisition. The company builds virtual platforms for TI, Intel and Freescale and Synopsys plans to add more to the channel.

Of course one of the biggest problems with virtual platforms is building the models. Thus far models are hard to make, even if they are in a standard language like SystemC, and putting them together to develop a virtual product is even harder for the average Joe and Jane designer. It's a curse for users and the traditional tools sales model but it may be a blessing for vendors that offer the whole ESL enchilada, like Synopsys and CoWare and seemingly Mentor with the (Summit acquisition) even if the vendor has a proprietary language for modeling. (And where Virtio has a foothold in the cell market, Alain Labat's company VaST has similarly formidable following in automotive—auto makers were gushing about them in my first feature of the year.) ESL indeed may be a razor sales model: selling the razor for cheap and making the real money on the blades. So perhaps the promise of ESL may not evolve as a traditional tools market: rather, it may come to fruition as a services gig much in the same way PDF Solutions sells its services to fabs and foundries. PDF, too, started as a traditional EDA sales gig, but the tools were too hard to use so PDF had to ship PhDs with the tools to run them. Making lemonade out of lemons—PDF hired an army of PhDs to be AEs. It worked. Now you have a good company in PDF solving a bunch or problems for fabs. See Lucio (Lanza), EDA is evolving the way you said it should—they just don't want to give you credit for it.

 

Posted by Michael Santarini on October 25, 2006 | Comments (1)

October 30, 2006
In response to: Will the real ESL market stand up? A nod to Gary and Lucio
Sanjay Srivastava commented:

Mike, Really good summary IMO of ESL. I am skeptical, however, of the service model. For virtual platforms to be useful, they need to be developed before the reference platforms for ISVs and OEMs, and before RTL for internal use. If you deliver after RTL is done, emulation provides a formidable alternative for at least internal software teams. IMO that means that the process of building virtual prototype development needs to be heavily integrated at point of architecture development and the platform team needs to have a sense of urgency about getting it out quickly. Gary was right all along. ESL is clearly the next big grwoth opportunity after DFM. Waiting for reference platform to start software validation, and in some case, software development, is completely on an unsustainable trajectory. I have heard about an entire generation of a SOC being useless for the market place because that is the time it took to get a reasonable amount of software infrastructure built and validated for the platform. When Denali acquired the technology to sell Spectra, we have been having all sorts of debates internally about system validation, platform-level optimization, and how to get it done so that it is relevant for the latest and greates platforms in a timely manner. There is obviously a huge amount of value the EDA industry can add in terms of both TTM and development cost by workign out the technology and economics of virtual software development platforms. Sanjay

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows