Subscribe to EDN

Bullseye!

February 21, 2008

As I noted in yesterday afternoon’s post, the U.S. Navy planned that evening (shortly after the successful re-entry and touchdown of the Space Shuttle Atlantis) to attempt destruction of a failing spy satellite, via a three-stage RIM-161 SM-3 missile launched from the USS Lake Erie northwest of Hawaii. I was happily surprised to log onto Yahoo! News late last night and discover that the interception undertaking was successful, to the extent that the Navy now strongly believes (but as I write these words has not yet definitively concluded) that the satellite’s fuel tank containing 1,000 pounds of hazardous hydrazine was also obliterated by the non-explosive ‘kill vehicle’ at the missile’s tip.

The statistics are pretty mind-boggling. The satellite, USA 193, was roughly the size of a school bus and weighted approximately 5,000 lbs, according to Marine Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. At the time of the missile launch, the satellite was in uncontrolled orbit approximately 153 miles above the U.S.S. Erie, slicing through space at greater than 17,000 MPH. The combined impact speed of the satellite and missile, ~3 minutes after the latter’s launch, was estimated at 22,783 MPH.

My congratulations go out to the hard-working engineering community in creating the innumerable systems whose successful inter-operation led to this achievement. A special acknowledgement was earned by the coders who, with very little lead time, re-wrote the firmware for the missile and its partnering launch and tracking systems, to enable them to more accurately target a ‘cold’ satellite versus the ‘hot’ ICBMs (which travel at half the speed of the USA 193 satellite, and at much lower elevations above terra firma, to boot) that the system was originally designed to hunt.

Granted, my first engineering job was with a government defense contractor, so achievements like this have a particularly warm spot in my heart…and I’m not (necessarily…ahem) implying that last night’s mission suggests a broadening of the U.S. military’s defensive and offensive capabilities into the anti-satellite realm. What are your thoughts on last night’s events, readers?

Posted by Brian Dipert on February 21, 2008 | Comments (3)

February 21, 2008
In response to: Bullseye!
waterdog commented:

Absolutely outstanding work for all the engineers and technicians both civilian as well as military - don't forget the squids who loaded the missile, maintained the gear, got the ship out to sea in a storm, sat at their consoles, tracked the target and pulled the trigger as well. They all make me doubly proud - I'm an ex-Electronic Warfare Technician and current EE.


February 21, 2008
In response to: Bullseye!
JS commented:

This is roughly equivalent to hitting a BB with a 1/10 inch piece of eversharp lead, from 1/2 mile away, while both are moving at Mach 34. Then there's the atmospheric and gravitic deltas. Most Excellent!


February 21, 2008
In response to: Bullseye!
PaulR commented:

You are right: Not one person in 10, maybe not even 1 in 100 has any idea what it takes to pull off something like this, though most readers here, do, of course. Pretty doggone awesome... Did they shoot during the eclipse?

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows