Subscribe to EDN

The Remix: Copyright Infringement Or Career Enhancement?

April 9, 2009

Because I know that you enjoy watching video clips to wrap up your work weeks, here’s another one for you to check out:

The Israeli developer, Ophir Kutiel (aka ‘Kutiman’) mixed together the audio and video from various already-published amateur and professional musicians’ YouTube clips (all of which he’s been careful to credit) to come up with his creative masterpieces. The one above, the first in the series, is entitled ‘Mother of All Funk Chords’. Here are links to the other six:

These are examples of the remix, also known as the mashup. Want to see some more video on the subject? Here’s a recent series of clips from the Colbert Report initiated by an interview with well-known Stanford Law Professor and reduced-restriction advocate Lawrence Lessig:

The Colbert Report Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Lawrence Lessig
colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor NASA Name Contest

Stephen’s Remix Challenge

The Colbert Report Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Stephen’s Remix Challenge
colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor NASA Name Contest

Colbert certainly doesn’t seem to mind others remixing audio and video clips from his shows. But why should he; after all, the resultant mashups only increase his popularity!

Want a non-audio, non-video example? Heard of Shepard Fairey, the artist who created the well-known "Hope" Barack Obama poster, and who was interviewed by Stephen Colbert in mid-January?

The Colbert Report Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Shepard Fairey
colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor NASA Name Contest

Well, two weeks later Fairey got sued by the Associated Press for using a photograph by AP artist Mannie Garcia as his reference, even though it’s indistinguishable from countless other Obama shots, Fairey substantially (debatably) altered the original to come up with his iconic art piece, he didn’t personally profit from it, and it’s not even clear that the AP owns the copyright anyway…none of which prevented the AP from insulting his artistic skills (as if that had anything to do with the merits of the case). The Colbert Report took up the debate:

The Colbert Report Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Obama Poster Debate - David Ross and Ed Colbert
colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor NASA Name Contest

What’s my take on the topic? I’m torn. Keep in mind that as a print and online writer who also has a number of published books in his repertoire, I admittedly have a particularly personal investment in the topic of copyright.

On the one hand, I don’t agree with someone repackaging another’s content without attribution and, if appropriate, monetary compensation. I’m reminded, for example, of the mid-1990s lawsuit filed against ZZ Top by John Lee Hooker and his business partner, which was settled out of court. I’m also reminded of the 2003 lawsuit filed against the Beastie Boys by James Newton; this case went to trial, where interestingly it failed the breach of copyright test because the sampled audio clip was judged too short and compositionally incomplete.

On the other hand, I remember the 1986 remake of Aerosmith’s ‘Walk This Way’ by Run D.M.C. At the time, formerly huge Aerosmith was in the midst of a generally un-successful comeback effort led by the band’s first album for Geffen Records, Done With Mirrors. Walk This Way wasn’t a remix in the purest sense, as it was done with the band’s blessing (and in fact the participation of Steven Tyler and Joe Perry, who appeared both on the track and in the associated video). But the remake’s positive impact on the resurrection of Aerosmith’s career is undisputable.

If the topic of mashups and remixes is of interest to you, here are a few more links from my archives, for your further research:

Happy weekend, all.

Posted by Brian Dipert on April 9, 2009 | Comments (2)

April 10, 2009
In response to: The Remix: Copyright Infringement Or Career Enhancement?
Brian Dipert commented:

Dear Loring, ahhh...another Zappa fan! The family has certainly been 'enthusiastic' about garnering as much revenue as possible from Frank's abundant archives (including Dweezil going out on tour as 'Zappa Does Zappa'); Gail has had some pretty scathing words to say about 'freeloaders' in the past, has filed lawsuits against folks using Frank's image and against cover bands, etc. To the point of my writeup above, I can't help but wonder if she's doing more harm than good...if the 'free' advertising that she's rallying against would actually lead to more Zappa library material sales! And I can't help but wonder if Frank would agree with his family's perspective. It's similarly been interesting to watch the Dead's perspective on bootlegging 'evolve' as money has seemingly become an increasingly key motivation.


April 10, 2009
In response to: The Remix: Copyright Infringement Or Career Enhancement?
Loring commented:

To celebrate the reissue of Lumpy Gravy, NPR's All Things Considered carried a story Thursday about whether Frank Zappa's widow, Gail, was keeping too tight a grasp on licensing rights for Zappa's works. She spoke willingly on radio, and did not come across in the category of pure evil that, say, RIAA resides in. But there were interesting points made by both sides.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows