Subscribe to EDN

Where In The World Is Foveon: The Silicon Eye

March 16, 2007

Continued from 'Imaging Beyond Pixels: Where In The World Is Foveon?'….

While researching my print article, I coincidentally happened across several individuals who had a close past history with Foveon, either as former employees of the company itself or of its foundry partners. They all insisted on anonymity, but they consistently mentioned availability- and cost-crippling sensor yield issues that repeatedly hobbled Foveon's aspirations. Also, in lieu of a direct conversation with Foveon representatives, I turned to a book about the company called 'The Silicon Eye' that had long lingered on my to-read pile.

The Silicon Eye's author is George Gilder, a tech industry analyst. Gilder is well known for his unbridled (some would say excessive) enthusiasm for the topics he writes about, and he has a reputation for recurrently shilling Foveon in his newsletter and within his presentations, so I admittedly cracked opened the book with no shortage of pre-assembled cynicism. I was, I must say, pleasantly surprised with what I read, although not overwhelmingly so. To wit, although the paperback edition is 285 pages long (excluding the glossary, acknowledgements and index), Gilder doesn't begin to cover Foveon in detail until page 201.

The Silicon Eye is an engaging overview of Carver Mead and his team of students-later-employees at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), and of Federico Faggin. I also enjoyed the historical perspective on Synaptics, a spin-off of Mead's many-year-long struggle to translate his analog sensing and processing theories into shipping products. Ironically, the first fruits of Synaptics' R&D, as explained in Chapter 15 'Seizing The Sword', ended up being digital-centric. And Gilder was more moderate about Foveon's future prospects than I anticipated he'd be.

He points out, for example, the company's already well-entrenched CCD and CMOS sensor competitors, along with the Drucker's Rule necessity for Foveon's products to be 10 times better than those competitors in order to displace them to any meaningful degree. But ultimately, I walked away from The Silicon Eye knowing little more about the secretive company than I did before reading page 1 of the book. One paragraph is particularly telling, in my mind (bolded emphasis added for effect):

Nonetheless, just one month before Photokina 2000, while the company was still preparing to push its prisms to a mostly indifferent camera market, Dick Merrill emerged from his aluminum chassis with yet another concept for a single-chip color filter. Added to his original idea was a simple but revolutionary process step entirely compatible with the CMOS process flow. Still a company secret today, the new Merrill scheme turned the showstopper inside out. What had previously been an impossible obstacle to a vertical filter became a radical simplification and improvement. An invention as elegant as Carver Mead's exploitation of the parasitic bipolar transistor as a photodetector, Merrill's idea was still more commercially promising.

Foveon unveiled the X3 image sensor at the September 2000 Photokina. Six and a half years later, the company seemingly still hasn't achieved sustainable success. Draw your own conclusions.

I hope this writeup will stimulate a response from the company. If so, I'll report back after we've had a chance to chat. And if any of you have thoughts about Foveon you'd like to share, either anonymously or publicly, and either based on arm's-reach observation or hands-on experience, I'm all ears (or is that eyes?).

Posted by Brian Dipert on March 16, 2007 | Comments (6)

April 13, 2010
In response to: Where In The World Is Foveon: The Silicon Eye
Jabob, Haifa, Israel commented:

Again this Foveon vc Bayer marturbation ? I'm wondering who the author "just" invited to populates this topic and give him some credit... I had many good laughs reading the previpus post about Foveon cameras. It appears that every single reader, besides one or two, has a just opposite opinion. Now who is right and who is wrong ? The autor or near one hundred posts telling that Foveon cameras are great ? Probably I'll order one just to check. This guy Justme said a lot of beautiful words, but honestly, for me he missed the point. Looks more like a nerd than a photographer. I read several arcticles from Brian, some are interesting and some are really crappy, like the one about Windows Vista and of course both ones about Foveon sensors.


March 2, 2010
In response to: Where In The World Is Foveon: The Silicon Eye
Foveonic commented:

The problem with text, is there is no tone of voice. I mean no insult with the crack pipes comment. It was tongue in cheek. What amazes me is how defensive individuals get. The Sigma cams aren't for everbody. No camera is.... it just produces some unique images. Which apparently not everyone can see. However, with a little effort and indivdual can view many images from the Foveon Sensor on many different sites. But, I gotta say that computer monitors do no real justice. I print at 16x20 and they look fabulous IMHO. I have the DP2 and have had many many many cameras film and digital. I love this little unit for on the go quick artistic captures that can be printed at size with the help of Genuine Fractals. So, to each his own...best.


October 5, 2009
In response to: Where In The World Is Foveon: The Silicon Eye
Foveonic commented:

Foveon nay-sayers put down your crack pipes and look at the images these low mega-pixel count sensors produce. More realistic film-like qualities with superior dymamic range. If Foveon can survive and reach full frame status with more photosites.... lookout! The real problem is Sigam can't build cameras for sh!t.....When they figure out how to build cameras more people will flock to the stellar image quality. I sold my Canon Bayers and am shooting exclusively Foveon. I love the results. Peace


July 30, 2008
In response to: Where In The World Is Foveon: The Silicon Eye
ecs commented:

I was doing a 'net search on recent Foveon activity and found this article. The responses -- while a bit dated -- are perplexing. At least the ones disparaging of Foveon based commercial cameras. While the technology has not yet caught on as a mass market commodity, there are many very critical and very satisfied users of the SD14 and now the DP1. I have two Sigma DSLRs myself and my humble efforts have generated thousands of credible, occasionally noteworthy images. Professionals are using the SDs artistically and profitably. With respect for the opinions of all, those who discount the Foveon as a practical technology are at best uninformed.


March 30, 2007
In response to: Where In The World Is Foveon: The Silicon Eye
WK Chan commented:

Subjectively, the Foveon sensor seems to render texture so much better then anything else. In a Foveon image, complexion, textile, wood or metal objects are captured with discernible differences in surface texture. In most other digital images, all objects seem to be coated with a varnish. Sigma/Foveon fans are rather generous in sharing their pictures in full-sized images. Check out these images of the Bay Area: www.pbase.com/moonlite/_sigma_sd14 Question for Brian -- are there any research on how the human eye perceive texture? I suspect it is not just pixels. After all, the impressionist painter seems to capture lights and texture well without fine lines.


March 17, 2007
In response to: Where In The World Is Foveon: The Silicon Eye
ega278 commented:

I''ve been waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and I''m still waiting for the Foveon sensor to flood the electronics stores. I was hoping to be able to buy a point and shoot digital camera from a respectable company with the 4.5 MP Foveon sensor at the latest within a year and a half from the date of the news release. Here it is a century later and still nothing but a crappy Polaroid and some high end DSLR''s, and the DSLR''s don''t use the "low resolution" 4.5 MP sensor. I can only assume that either the technology is not viable, or Foveon is asking an unreasonable amount to use it''s product. Even after all the waiting, I''m still fascinated with the magical sensor so I will continue to wait and scorn and bitch and gripe and complain until I can buy my camera. Hell, I''ll even take a 4.5 MP sensor in a mobile phone!

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows