Subscribe to EDN

EV-DO 'A' From The San Francisco Bay: My, My, My...Watch The Bits Fly!

March 16, 2007

Greetings from Woodside, CA. Earlier this evening, as previously promised, I re-ran my EV-DO Rev. 0 and A testing, this time on both Sprint and Verizon's service. I was in downtown Mountain View, CA, at Dana Street Roasting Company. For the full effect of the (generally) increased performance here versus last night in Sacramento, make sure you read both this writeup and my prior report.

First off, here are the BroadbandReports results of my three consecutive tests of Sprint's EV-DO Rev. A network, again run against MegaPath Networks' San Francisco server.



Ack latencies for pings of Yahoo's server averaged ~180 msec.

 

Next, let's look at Verizon's EV-DO Rev. A service, which as you'll see from the numbers below, was definitely operating in Mountain View.



The first ping-to-ack latency in this case was consistently ~500 msec, but subsequent ack latencies were only ~110 msec.

 

For comparison sake, let's look at Sprint's service at that same location, with my prior-generation EV-DO Rev. 0 card



Ack latencies here averaged ~280 msec, with random and occasional pushouts beyond that time

 

And finally, here's Verizon's EV-DO Rev. 0 results



Here, latencies were consistently ~170 msec.

 

Finally, since I was in the heart of Google's municipal broadband Wi-Fi footprint, I decided to re-run my rudimentary testing of it, first conducted last summer. I was underwhelmed then, and I'm no more impressed this time around. Keep these results in mind when, in the near future, I talk about wireless VoIP.

I was a half block from downtown Mountain View, and from a Wi-Fi access point mounted on top of a service pole at an intersection, yet I only (and only occasionally) got one bar's (out of five max) worth of reception strength from inside Dana Street Roasting Company. Stepping outside, I achieved between 3-4 bars of signal strength, and I snapped this photo of the access point to prove how close I was to it, and what my line-of-sight proximity was to it.

Here are the BroadbandReports results:



Downloads were reasonably interruption-free, judging from the activity pattern presented on Task Manager's Networking tab. Uploads, however, were hit-and-miss, as the above results exhibit. The ping tests of Yahoo's server were equally erratic, generally between 10-20 msec but with frequent excursions to 50 msec and beyond.

 

With all of the above results, I'd encourage you to not get hung up on the absolute numbers. On different days, at different times of day, at different locations and with different EV-DO cards, the numbers you get might be somewhat different. However, if you compare the EV-DO Rev. A results with their EV-DO Rev. 0 predecessors, I think you'll agree that the newer technology delivers tangible advantages, both in upload and download speed and in latency. I'm not sure why my Sprint results in Mountain View this evening were so much faster on average than they were in Sacramento yesterday; I'll ask my Sprint PR contacts for clarification and will report back anything interesting I uncover.

Posted by Brian Dipert on March 16, 2007 | Comments (2)

October 22, 2007
In response to: EV-DO 'A' From The San Francisco Bay: My, My, My...Watch The Bits Fly!
Brian Dipert commented:

Bill, those images were hosted on DSL Reports' site. I guess that after a certain timeframe, they flush 'em. Sorry about that. In the future, I'll download the images from DSL Reports and upload/host them on EDN's site instead


October 22, 2007
In response to: EV-DO 'A' From The San Francisco Bay: My, My, My...Watch The Bits Fly!
Bill H. commented:

Where are the speed test results refered to in the article? It appears that they ought to be displayed within the 14 or so boxes contained in the article, but they are all empty, except for a common link to speedtests.dslreports.com. But the link does not lead to the specific tests.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows