Subscribe to EDN

VUDU's Re-Do: The Bandwidth Burden's On You

October 7, 2008

Speaking of Internet video distribution…when I last mentioned VUDU, a longstanding focus area here at Brian’s Brian, the company had just laid off 20% of its staff and had added porn to its content repertoire. One month later, what’s changed? Encouraging developments, at least at first glance. The company’s bundling $200 in free movie credits with each box sold at Best Buy. It’s also now offering high bitrate ‘HDX’ versions of its high-definition titles, at no incremental rental cost to conventional high-def counterparts.

Given my past criticism of VUDU’s high-def video quality, you might think I’d be thrilled with the news. And I was…until I took a closer look. As the below screenshot shows, the HDX version of a title takes substantially longer to download than its conventional HD counterpart:

When I first heard about VUDU’s no-added-cost HDX plans, I was therefore initially confused; wouldn’t the incremental storage and delivery bandwidth incurred by the company unduly eat into its profit? But then I recalled that VUDU relied on a P2P model for content distribution…and the light bulb went on in my head.

My VUDU box is (or more accurately was…keep reading…) router-tethered via a HomePlug AV powerline spur, so it’s pretty easy for me to monitor its network access patterns by viewing the activity lights on the corresponding Actiontec HPE200AV adapter. About a week before VUDU launched HDX (and in preparation for the launch to come, I now realize), I noticed that the VUDU box (which had already monopolized my DSL connection much more than I preferred) was constantly doing data transfers. By constantly, I mean 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Ever since then, my VoIP sessions have suffered from frequent dropouts, ‘ack’ responses to ‘pings’ I make to various servers have been substantially delayed, and network clients have generally suffered from degraded LAN and WAN performance.

Last Sunday, I finally had enough. I powered down the VUDU box, and network performance returned to normal. I’m keeping it that way; as far as I’m concerned, VUDU will never again dominate any network I’m responsible for. You’re therefore going to have to take David Pogue’s word on HDX’s claimed ‘insane sharpness’, because you’ll get no quality review from me. Anyway, I’m skeptical that HDX’s incremental image improvement will lead to success with mainstream consumers. A big part of the appeal of Internet-delivered video is the instant-gratification factor…instead of getting in your car, driving to the video store, finding out that the movie you want isn’t available and settling for a less appealing alternative, then driving home, you can punch a few buttons on a remote control and, within a minute or few, be enjoying the exact title you want to watch.

Now consider the HDX scenario. 11+ hours is by no means instant gratification. In fact, it far exceeds the roundtrip video store alternative. Granted, I realize that you can queue up a download in the morning, either from the box or online via account access, and it’ll be ready to go that evening…but where’s the spontaneity in that? And will the average consumer notice the claimed quality improvement, anyway? It’s a funny thing about video compression, which I’ve seen time and time again in my own testing; up to a certain point, increasing the compressed bitrate makes substantive improvements in the quality results but, past that codec-, setting- and content-dependent threshold, the return on the incremental bitrate investment rapidly disappears.

Here’s my theory, and it’s at the root of my disappointment with VUDU’s continued P2P reliance. I suspect that the company has given up on capturing a sustainable beachhead versus bigger online distribution competitors such as Amazon, Apple and Netflix. Instead, it’s (in true dot-com tradition) throwing out any pretense of securing a profit, in favor of garnering as large a customer base as possible as quickly as possible, and in the hopes of finding a bigger-pocketed buyer. It’s burning through its accumulated hardware inventory via a Best Buy fire sale. And it’s making its loyal early adopter customers shoulder the incremental bandwidth burden, caps and throttles be damned.

I’m not remotely impressed. Shame on you, VUDU.

Posted by Brian Dipert on October 7, 2008 | Comments (6)

October 14, 2008
In response to: VUDU's Re-Do: The Bandwidth Burden's On You
.made commented:

Whoopy-fecking-do for you. Did you even read the article? Its about >UPLOAD< bandwidth dummy.


October 14, 2008
In response to: VUDU's Re-Do: The Bandwidth Burden's On You
Tyler commented:

What kind of Crappy DSL connection do you have? THe HDX movies on took 3 hrs on my Comcast cable connection.


October 7, 2008
In response to: VUDU's Re-Do: The Bandwidth Burden's On You
VOD download commented:

@"Ray Von" - First: I disappointed with Brian since if he was talking about HDX then he could consider to talk about the quality of the movie. If he just used that to criticize about bandwidth usage (regarding 11 hrs download) then it's nothing new. It's just repetitive info over and over from his previous articles. Only advertisement or negative campaign does that. - Second: there is option to lower the bandwidth usage to suite the user limit. If the user lowers it down to "Delayed SD" then it use the max of 100 kpps to upload. A lot of Comcast/cable modem got built-in UDP flood protection, and it caused the network slow down. - Third: P2P is the only technology that can allow you to have HDX (closest download quality) with the same price of HD. It's sharing and utilize network when idle.


October 7, 2008
In response to: VUDU's Re-Do: The Bandwidth Burden's On You
Brian Dipert commented:

Dear Ray Von, I haven't rented a movie in several weeks, yet VUDU still uses substantial amounts of both my upstream and downstream bandwidth. So although I realize that some of that download payload is caused by them 'pushing' me previews, the first few minutes' worth of each film for instant-on standard def purposes (as I've written about at www.edn.com/blog/400000040/post/1000026300.html), etc, I concur with you that VUDU is likely also using my box as a server housing substantial amounts of content that I haven't even asked for. Thanks for writing


October 7, 2008
In response to: VUDU's Re-Do: The Bandwidth Burden's On You
Ray Von commented:

@"VOD download" - You've completely failed to see the authors (extremely valid IMO) point regarding Vudu's bandwidth usage. Of course we all know the limitations of bandwidth, and it would be unfair to blame a movie download service for the limitations of our connections. If you pay a little more attention to what he's saying I'm sure you'll appreciate the issue. The issue ISN'T simply download bandwidth - even if you've only got a 2-4MB connection, at least if Vudu uses all your bandwidth to serve you a movie, you know it's for YOUR benefit. Vudu's use of YOUR bandwidth for IT'S benefit is a completly different matter. As I've also found to my cost the big issue with Vudu (and AFAIK this is unique to their service) is the P2P aspect which means the customer UPLOADS the movie data to other customers on Vudu's behalf. A fact they don't exactly go out of their way to broadcast. I was able to monitor this activity on my network and see that not only did my Vudu constantly upload data, taking around 40-50% of my available bandwidth, it also downloaded large amounts when not in use, leading me to believe that it downloads and caches movies I haven't ordered and serves them to others. On my 20mb/sec downstream, 768kb/sec upstream (if I'm lucky) cable I could quite comfortably download a 10mb/sec (Vudu's claimed average data rate for HDX) film directly from a movie download service capable of providing it at that speed, leaving me plenty of headroom to do other things on my connection. With Vudu on my LAN I've got so little upstream bandwidth left that it severly impacts on the useability of my network. I wouldn't mind if it was for MY benefit, but it's not. Not only that, if I had a capped or pay-by-use connection it would actually cost ME money to subsidize Vudu's movie distribution. Not on, not on at all.


October 7, 2008
In response to: VUDU's Re-Do: The Bandwidth Burden's On You
bigRoN commented:

This is why physical discs, such as Blu-Ray are not dead. With Blu-Ray, you have the highest-quality image and sound and no downloading. Brian is lucky to have the DSL he has. Many people, like my parents, live further away from a city and their best network speeds come from satellite internet, with speeds much slower than 1 Mbps (advertised to be about 1 Mbps) and long latencies. I happen to have fiber-to-the-house from SureWest, so VUDU's service may work well for me, but I can understand why it isn't for everyone.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows