Subscribe to EDN

The Web 2.0 Foul-Up: A Postini Follow-Up

June 10, 2008

My recent spam (and bigger-picture Web 2.0) rant was of interest to a fair percentage of you, judging from the number of both public comments and private emails I received in response to its publication, so I thought I’d craft a follow-up post. When I was in Taiwan two weeks back, plagued by a spam-pummeled work email inbox, I shot off a message to my IT counterparts containing a simple query; was spam filtering perchance disabled on my account, or was my account configured with inappropriately lax settings? IT’s response was prompt and to-the-point; of course Postini was enabled, and the filtering settings were global for Reed’s email system, not account-specific.

This response didn’t jive with a comment my writeup got from a reader named Allen, and it also was counter to the experiences of my co-worker, Matt, who claimed to almost never see spam in his inbox. On a hunch, I figured out how to log onto my Postini Message Center…and lo and behold, I found that spam filtering was completely disabled on my particular account. Another email to IT (this one admittedly more vitriolic in its verbage) got spam filtering turned on, and the relief was immediate, with only a few spam messages getting through in the last 24 hours. I’ve got all of the Postini filtering settings (bulk email, sexually explicit, get-rich-quick, special offers, and racially insensitive) at their most-aggressive levels right now, and the daily Quarantine Summary email I just received (which, amusingly but understandably, got tagged as spam by Outlook’s built-in filtering due to its subject-line list content) only contains one incorrectly-tagged valid email out of the several hundred that Postini redirected away from my inbox.

None of this, of course, detracts from the fundamental point of my prior writeup; that community-influenced ‘experiences’ such as Gmail’s spam filtering algorithm will be inevitably degraded by the inconsistent and non-altruistic natures of community members. Nonetheless, I thought you’d like to know of my increased confidence in Postini’s alternative spam-filtering approach ;-)

Posted by Brian Dipert on June 10, 2008 | Comments (2)

December 7, 2011
In response to: The Web 2.0 Foul-Up: A Postini Follow-Up
Lateisha commented:

Aritecls like this make life so much simpler.


June 2, 2010
In response to: The Web 2.0 Foul-Up: A Postini Follow-Up
hotel buchen tunesien commented:

Computer Confidence,date fashion acquire exhibition exercise teach transfer rate secure category concern below display along foot environment meeting difficulty forget work forest comment advice variety cut damage active arrange intention publication seek far opinion studio business particular race river possibility look screen drink allow also hot employee realize library confidence east concern session prospect odd date current solution sample shot familiar market hand date mental death reach rain editor act release warn current his package sea here move mainly prisoner company success entry for upon impact officer offence clean sentence conversation regard specific half annual

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows