Subscribe to EDN

CES 2010: Powerline Networking Updates And Prognostications

January 13, 2010

One of a series of planned posts from the 2010 Consumer Electronics Show…

After meetings with various companies and alliances involved in powerline networking last week at CES, I have some thoughts:

  • Powerline networking is here to stay. It’s not problem-free; believe me, I know this intimately, after many years’ worth of experimentation and frustration. But it works well often enough to be a credible alternative to stringing CAT5 or coax cable around the house, to (slowly) leveraging oft-inconveniently located phone jacks, or to relying solely on a wireless topology that’s prone to RF interference from other ISM band signal sources, along with chicken wire-and-other attenuation. And it’s so darn convenient; plug two adapters into outlets to form a powerline spur, and you’re (theoretically, at least) ready to go.
  • Atheros made a smart acquisition last year. Back in September, the company announced that it was paying roughly $250M USD for Intellon, the leading powerline networking technology supplier. Keep in mind that Atheros got not only products but also engineers and years’ worth of accumulated expertise, along with (perhaps most importantly) a robust patent portfolio. The deal closed in December, and at CES Atheros announced the first fruits of the purchase, the AR7400 chipset, and its first customer, Monster Cable (no, Gizmodo, AMD didn’t make the chip). The AR7400 is IEEE 1901 Draft v2-compliant (albeit single-PHY, i.e. OFDM-only) and HomePlug AV backwards compatible. I didn’t realize until reading Atheros’ press release that IEEE 1901 specifies a wider operating frequency range (2 MHz to 50 MHz) than the current HomePlug AV standard (2MHz to 30 MHz), while of course still supporting band notching to avoid interference with ham radio and other broadcast sources. Also, akin to what Intellon did with proprietary ‘85 Mbps’ HomePlug 1.0 Turbo versus industry-standard ‘12 Mbps’ HomePlug 1.0, the AR7400 optionally supports operation up to 75 MHz, along with an advanced high density 4096 QAM scheme, enables an all-A7400 topology to potentially run at greater-than-500 Mbps PHY rates.
  • Speaking of high-speed powerline networking, Gigle strives on. I received confirmation at CES that my earlier suspicion was correct; the HomePlug AV and Mediaxtreme modes of the Belkin adapters I tested were constantly ‘fighting’ with each other to be the protocol in use on my network, which is why I ended up with sub-HomePlug AV transfer rates. I should have new firmware to test within a month. Gigle also admitted that the company had been pushed by Belkin to prematurely release the technology to market, driven by Belkin’s desires to hit the Christmas shopping season in a sole-sourced position.
  • Speaking of Gigle, the company is confident that the aggressive pricing of its GGL301 HomePlug AV-only IC, enabled by a leading-edge fabrication lithography and other cost-slimming measures, will finally put the final nail in the coffin of surprisingly long-lingering HomePlug 1.0 Turbo. Ironically, this prediction was made by Andy Melder, now of Gigle and formerly of HomePlug 1.0 Turbo developer Intellon. Andy dodged my question of whether or not the GGL301 and fuller-featured GGL541 were sourced from the same die; I suspect the answer is ‘yes’, at least currently.
  • And speaking of HomePlug AV, it’s quickly becoming the dominant ‘200 Mbps’ powerline approach in use worldwide. I forecasted this outcome a while back. While Panasonic continues to sell HD-PLC adapters in Japan, the company’s wavelet-based approach has not achieved broad adoption outside of that country. As such, I doubt there’ll be many (if any) costly dual-PHY IEEE 1901-compliant adapters made…an outcome which I daresay the HomePlug camp suspected back when they did the deal with HD-PLC in the first place. And both Gigle (Spain) and SPiDCOM (France) blunt any European momentum that competitor DS2 might otherwise be able to muster.
  • Speaking of DS2, it appears to be on life support (or worse). Widespread rumor at the show indicated that company Vice President Chano Gómez left the company several weeks ago, and that DS2 has run out of money (reflected in the fact that the company didn’t even have a booth at CES this year, far from the expensive pervasive promotional banners of years’ past). With DS2’s demise. if the rumors are correct, seemingly also go the powerline portions of the ITU’s G.hn standards group. That is, unless G.hn faces up to de facto standardization reality and incorporates HomePlug AV into its specifications instead.
  • And speaking of silicon sourcing evolutions, you should expect more acquisitions (as well as, perhaps, culls) in this particular technology space over the coming year. Along with the earlier-mentioned purchase of Intellon by Atheros, Sigma Designs bought CopperGate Communications last November (PDF). Who’s left to snap up in the HomePlug AV space? Arkados, Gigle, and SPiDCOM come to mind. And who might their acquirers be? Broadcom and Marvell are the most likely candidates. Broadcom’s Stephen Palm was extremely evasive and nebulous when I tried to press him on this topic during our Saturday lunch meeting. But Broadcom has a track record of waiting until a given networking technology has become sufficiently mature before investing in it; look at the company’s purchase of Octalica in mid-2007, along with its longstanding avoidance of UWB (UltraWideBand). 2010 may be the year that Broadcom and a competitor-or-few finally take the powerline networking purchase plunge.
Posted by Brian Dipert on January 13, 2010 | Comments (1)

January 15, 2010
In response to: CES 2010: Powerline Networking Updates And Prognostications
arclight commented:

@SoCalTechGuy: Two comments: 1. WRT use of QAM, an additional consideration is generation of IM products either in the transmission media or the transmitter output stages. These are going to further decrease the signal/noise ratio. In the cellular world, even 64QAM becomes questionable due to the non-linearities in the subscriber unit transmitter PA (with OFDM, the 3-tone 3rd-order IM products fall on the same frequency as the tones themselves). The lower required power levels for PLC technology, combined with PA stages that provide high linearity through brute force (i.e. drawing lots of current), may be sufficient to allow higher QAM levels. 2. Use of the VHF lowband TV spectrum from 54-88 MHz need not require data beacons or anything else, if the spectrum is reallocated to make PLC primary. Recall that there are only a handful of US TV stations still in the band due to the DTV transition, and more will NOT be showing up; my suggestion was for the PLC industry to PAY TO MOVE THEM OUT as part of gaining primary status in the band. There are several benefits from doing this that significantly outweigh the costs: a. Known primary spectrum allocation, with the only requirement for notching to be at 72 MHz (industrial allocation) and 74.9-75.1 MHz (aero marker beacons). Known notches internationally = simpler design. Becoming primary in the US would go a long way toward becoming primary worldwide. There's almost nothing in that allocation anywhere in the world other than TV, and not much of that any longer, and no real takers for the spectrum due to antenna lengths. It's ideal for a new service that doesn't really want to radiate but which can't avoid it. b. Smaller percentage span between lowest / highest frequencies (2-30 MHz is over a decade; 54-88 MHz is not even one octave) allows application of simpler filtering and design techniques. c. No further worries about interference to other services (PLC is primary in the allocation). Power levels can be higher as needed. PLC technology is by all measures an intentional radiator. If we really believe it's necessary to go forward with PLC technology, we should do so in such a way that it can be successful. Pretending PLC is not a radiator, or not "much" of a radiator, is intellectually dishonest and penalizes other operators and services who have spent money (in many cases public money) on licenses and equipment. Allowing PLC to move into 30-50 MHz just further exacerbates this situation by guaranteeing interference to coverage-based RF systems used by public safety as well as others. If a public safety or industrial user experiences interference from this technology and is injured or killed as a result, how will the PLC backers respond? Is this going to be another Pinto gas tank fiasco?

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2011 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows