Subscribe to EDN

ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?

November 20, 2009

A draft proposal for the recast of the European Union’s ROHS (restriction of hazardous substances) directive has been published by the European Parliament (EP).

Among the proposed changes is to include all electrical products. The approach would be to add an 11th product category to the existing 10. The scope of the new category would simply be “other electrical and electronic equipment not covered by any of the categories 1-10.” In addition, the current exclusion of large-scale stationary industrial tools (LSIT) has been deleted and so all EEE (electrical and electronic equipment) including manufacturing production line equipment would be in scope.

Equipment covered by the new Category 11 would come into scope in July 2014.

The controversial “equipment that is part of another type of equipment that does not fall in scope and can only fulfil its function if it is part of that equipment,” is proposed to change to “part of stationary installations or transport equipment that is not electrical or electronic equipment.” This would bring into scope all electrical products used in building and transport (unless covered by other legislation such as the ELV directive), all “fixed installations” and electrical parts in aircraft, trains, ships, and commercial vehicles.

So the often quoted example of the car radio would, under the proposals, now be in scope.

The list of restricted substances has been increased considerably under the proposals, and includes PVC, chlorinated plasticizers, organohalogens, flame retardants, and the phthalates BBP, DBP, and DEHP. These will not be imposed on products in Categories 8, 9, or the new Category 11, until the European Commission has investigated and proposed a date.

The exemption for spare parts will be limited to 42 months after the amended directive enters into force. However, spare parts will have an exemption where the equipment benefited from an exemption that has subsequently expired.

The substances mentioned above will also be restricted in spare parts.

On exemptions themselves, the EP proposes that the expiry period is “up to” four years and not the current four years.

The Commission will decide within six months of an exemption expiring whether or not it will be renewed. Grace periods will be allowed, but for no more than 18 months after the exemption expires.

The Commission proposes to change the definition of homogeneous materials, which would now align itself more along the lines of China ROHS. The definition states that a homogeneous material is one that consists of only one material throughout, a combination of multiple materials that can not be mechanically disjointed into different materials or, finally, a surface coating.

These proposals will be debated well into 2010 but, once again, could have a significant impact on industry, not least leading to more substance data collection on products falling within scope and several new restricted substances.

Posted by Gary Nevison on November 20, 2009 | Comments (15)

January 21, 2010
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
Piter commented:

If you need electrical industrial equipment - visit us "www.midlandelectricsupply.com"


December 4, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
Cell phone jammers commented:

Nice blog you got here. I'd like to read more about that topic.


December 3, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
Phone blockers commented:

Great article you got here. I'd like to read a bit more about that topic.


November 25, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
Rod Dalitz commented:

Why restrict PVC in electronic products when huge amounts of PVC are used in buildings, cars, almost everywhere? Why restrict lead in the tiny amount of solder used in modern electronics, when lead sheet is freely used in building (in the UK at least) to seal roofing to walls? Restricting lead is not only disastrous for reliability, but may even be counter-productive on lead in the environment- I see a low price of scrap lead, and many more car batteries dumped in ditches.


November 24, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
Steve commented:

I once thought that some biological pathogen was to be our demise ... then comes ROHS!


November 24, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
cybermueller commented:

I agree with the Anarchist... you can't argue with good science and metallurgy. RoHS is nothing more than a beaurocratic mechanism for self-preservation and self-fulfillment. The forecasted longevity, performance, and reliability of our electronics resulting from test data is based on decades of pre-RoHS measurements. Manufacturing is still relying on this old database and simply "tweeks" their process to qualify their RoHS compliant products. It's like assuming a sprinter can COMPETETIVELY run in a marathon just because he can run a single mile in under 7 minutes. I have personally witnessed extremely high failure rates in RoHS-manufactured products over time, regardless that they had passed stringent measurements in quality control. Time is the essence of everything, and as RoHS-compliance becomes increasingly mandated, time will ultimately show us that this appliction of RoHS will have harmed more people than it has projected to protect.


November 24, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
ElecDist commented:

While there may be some long-term health benefits, these initiatives should be recognized by the Obama administration for what they truely are; disguised trade embargos by the EU and China. It seems the restrictions apply more to imports than exports.


November 24, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
A.B.Normal commented:

Enough of this ROHS CRAP! All Rohs ever did was increase the price of components, the price of tools, subject these components to more heat, and lower reliability in the long run. The higher temp required also probably increased power usage. We have electric guitar amps made in the 60s still working today, and we have brand new Rohs-compliant equipment breaking in a few months. And you can't fix/repair these new micro-mini wonder things. You have to buy a new one. The result: More electronic trash in the landfill.


November 24, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
Anarchist commented:

Hello United States Of America!!! Do you still exist, in any form. Will someone please stand up and put RoHS in the ditch. Why not take some of the Obama Funny Money and start manufacturing Components in the good old USA that have at least 3% lead in the solderable platings and solder as is required by Military Specification, and good science and metallurgy dictates is necessary!!! If there are any true Americans left they should only purchase used electronics that predate 2005, or have been remanufactured with lead in the solder. Only Sn63 with 37% lead should be used, period!!! All we need, already exists...control the waste streams!!!


November 23, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
Tom Tom commented:

Gary, thanks, good info.


November 23, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
TheBug commented:

Showing these people anything is useless since they do live in a world that is untouched by reality. If the industry could agree on something instead of some comanies always trying to rain on somebody elses parade we could just show them the middle finger. How long do you think Europe could do without any electronics? But when you tell the EU that electronics production is not possible without these substances someone will demonstrate that for his special case it is possible. The RoHS recast document that is refered to here makes the observation that there already are cell phone which are mostly halogen free (whatever that means), so they conclude it is applicable to all electronics. I wonder if the legislators resposible for this would want to take a test: Stay 2 minutes in a room with a burning halogen free cell phone, next stay 2 minutes in a room with a burning halogen free 50" TV set and complete A/V outfit.


November 23, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
Gary Nevison - author commented:

Dear bbbaney Yes, you are correct, I am referring to commercial vehicles. Probably not a great example but, in general, equipment in boats, trains and aeroplanes etc that was previously out of scope. Thanks for input.


November 22, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
Grog commented:

Would you want to fly in a plane with a guidance system or flight computer that was RoHS compliant? The BGA packages of a lot of processors have 0.5 mm spacing and I have to wonder how long they would continue to be reliable without lead soldering. Or safety critical equipment for that matter. You've published pictures of old electronic equipment from the 60s with tin whiskers. Maybe they should be shown to the people writing these RoHS requirements to illustrate the danger.


November 22, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
Battar commented:

The idea of restricting the use of flame retardants to increase our general health and safety seems disconnected from reality.


November 20, 2009
In response to: ROHS to cover all electrical and electronic equipment?
bbbaney commented:

I believe that the statement about the car radio is not correct. A car radio is considered to be part of the ELV Directive for ones contained in vehicles in ELV scope. Radios in commercial vehicles might now be in RoHS scope.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows