Subscribe to EDN

Restrictions on halogenated flame retardants

November 11, 2010

Currently the EU legislation that restricts certain halogenated flame retardants are ROHS and REACH.ROHS currently restricts PBB and PBDE with no exemptions. The proposed recast will not include restrictions on any other halogenated flame retardants, but will introduce a comitology procedure (i.e. carried out by the European Commission) for restricting additional substances, which will include these types of compounds, and HBCDD is likely to be considered at an early stage. The procedure is likely to be risk-based and similar to the restrictions procedure used by REACH, but will have an emphasis on risks at the end of life phase. The European Parliament proposal to include all halogenated flame retardants in Annex III of the recast appears to have been dropped, as Annex III will probably not be included. Member States will, however, propose specific substances for restriction by RoHS once the comitology procedure is in place.

REACH also restricts a few specific halogenated flame retardants including penta-BDE and octa-BDE. In addition, there are so far three that are Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC): HBCDD, SCCP, and Tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate, the first two of which have been proposed to require authorization for use. In the future, more specific halogenated flame retardants that meet the Article 57 criteria will be proposed to be SVHCs.

Outside of the EU, only certain US states have so far imposed restrictions on penta-BDE, octa-BDE, and a few also on Deca-BDE. China-ROHS, Korea-ROHS and Japan (J-MOSS) have information requirements for PBB and PBDE, but no restrictions, although China will restrict PBB and PBDE (but possibly not Deca-BDE) in its catalog-listed products, when this is adopted and enters force.

Green groups are still actively targeting halogenated flame retardants and are putting pressure on manufacturers and retailers to avoid these substances irrespective of legislation or the potential risk from substitutes.

Posted by Gary Nevison on November 11, 2010 | Comments (3)

May 9, 2011
In response to: Restrictions on halogenated flame retardants
sme commented:

The procedure is likely to be risk-based and similar to the restrictions procedure used by REACH


November 18, 2010
In response to: Restrictions on halogenated flame retardants
karen commented:

Agree with prior comment. It's unfortunate that many eco-groups and faux researchers are blind to the truth about fire safety and that all brominated flame retardants are not equal.


November 14, 2010
In response to: Restrictions on halogenated flame retardants
Battar commented:

The risk of fire from overheated plastic electrical equipment is greater than any health risk posed by the flame retardants. We will obviously be seeing more cheap electrical parts with no flame retardants at all in the future.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows