Vlad Dvorkin on a clever way to measure IP3 and non-linearity
So last Tuesday I called an RF aficionados meeting. I was sure to ask Earl McCune, author of Practical Digital Wireless Signals. I also asked James Long, an RF consultant and Vietnam vet. James told me he was prouder of his extra class Ham license than he was of being a professor at Cal Tech. Another go-to guy for RF is Linear Technology’s Vlad Dvorkin. Vlad is a hard-core systems engineer that helps LT customers design cell phone base stations and other RF hardware, like military and high-performance medical.
So the four of us are enjoying lunch, telling stories and discussing Spice, RF design tools, and 100 other things. Towards the end, we were talking about how the parts are getting so good it is getting hard to measure the distortion products and non-linearity of amplifiers and such. Vlad mentioned he had to use a Rohde & Schwarz spectrum analyzer for some to get that last bit of noise floor that high-dollar equipment can provide. Then he mentioned he had a neat trick for measuring distortion. You measure distortion by feeding your amp two tones that are nearly spaced in frequency. Any output frequency spurs are mixing products that non-linearity in the amplifier creates. Like I said, the parts are getting so good it is getting hard to measure the little spurs. One problem is that you don’t want to send the original two tones to the spectrum analyzer, it will saturate its front end and prevent you from seeing “down in the grass” as RF folks talk about signals just above the noise floor. So to take out the original two tones, Vlad whips out a napkin and sketches a test setup.
- Vlad Dvorkin nulls out the fundamental tones in the linearly evaluation setup.
I let the busboy pick up Vlad’s napkin, so I re-drew it here. He sends the two tones into a 180-degree phase splitter. He uses two identical amplifiers, and two identical attenuators. The trick is, on the amp he wants to measure, he hammers the input with big signals to get a full-scale output, and then attenuates it so he won’t burn out the spectrum analyzer. On the other phase, he puts the identical attenuator first. That amplifier is driven much less so it has hardly any distortion. After that amp, Vlad puts a phase tweaker and an adjustable attenuator, just so he can perfectly match the fundamental tones in the top path, only at 180 degrees out of phase. Then he adds the signals together in a 0-degree combiner and Voilà, the bottom path helps to minimize the two fundamental tones by 30 dB or so, and your spectrum analyzer is not over-driven. As a result you can really see the OIM3 (3rd order output inter-modulation distortion product) -100 dBm down.
I assume other RF engineers do this, Vlad never said it was his invention, it has been widely used in feed-forward RF power amplifiers, only that it was a really good way to measure IP3 when you have really good parts to evaluate, like Linear Tech makes. I am trying to get Vlad to write up these RF tricks for EDN, I will keep nagging him, this one was pretty sweet.
William Ketel. N8QVS commented:
The subtraction scheme seems similar to the old dietortionanalyzers of the early 1960s. More sophisticated, buta similar principlr. Using a second amplifier is the bigdiffernce.
Pete - K5BCG commented:
I used to be a "gofer" for a bunch of lunatic engineers and mad scientists. They would hand me stuff like this after lunch and have me chase the parts for them to build it. Theirs weren't so legible though since they favored felt-tip pens and it wasn't very legible. But I became pretty good at translating the glyphs. They were actually lots of fun to work with and respected my ability to scrounge parts. And the coolest of the lot were the ham guys . . .
Jimelectr commented:
Yep, that's classic feedforward cancellation. 10 years or so ago I was at Powerwave, where just about every cellular basestation power amplifier used feedforward. Maybe things are different now. I remember seeing some test equipment Pwave designed with Agilent that did that kind of cancellation so they could measure how good the PA's were. R&S spectrum analyzers were too expensive to have on every bench, so they had mostly Agilent models.
Tom commented:
Hi Paul, Really love the recent rash of RF and ham talk on yours and other EDN blogs. Keep discussing the good stuff. extra class KC9PSW















