Subscribe to EDN

Hunters and farmers: EDA salesforces

September 10, 2009

I wrote recently about mergers in the EDA space, mainly from the point of view of engineering which tends to end up being double booked keeping the existing standalone business going while at the same time integrating the technology into the acquiring companies product line.

The business side of the acquired company has a different set of dynamics. They only have to cope with running the existing business since any integration won’t be available for sale for probably a year after the acquisition. The basic strategy is to take the existing product that has presumably been selling well, and make it sell even better by pumping it through the much larger salesforce of the acquiring company.

The big question is what to do about the salesforce of the acquired company. A big problem is that there are really two types of salespeople that I like to call hunters and farmers. A startup salesforce is all hunters. A big company salesforce is all farmers. Some individuals are able to make the transition and play both roles, but generally salespeople are really only comfortable operating as either a hunter or a farmer.

Hunters operate largely as individuals finding just the right project that can make use of the startup’s technology. Think of a salesperson trying to find the right group in Qualcomm or the right small fabless semiconductor company. Farmers operate usually in teams to maximize the revenue that can be got out of existing relationships with the biggest customers. Think of Synopsys running its relationship with ST Microelectronics.

Given that most of the hunters are not going to become good farmers, or are not going to want to, then most of the acquired company’s salesforce will typically not last all that long in the acquired company. But they can’t all go immediately since they are the only resource in the world that knows how to sell the existing product, that has a funnel of future business already in development and probably have deals in flight on the point of closing. One typical way to handle things is to keep some or all of the existing salesforce from the acquired company, and create an overlay salesforce inside the acquired company specifically to focus on helping get the product into the big deals as they close.

The challenge is always that the existing salesforce doesn’t really want a new product to introduce into deals that are already in negotiation. They have probably already been working on the deal for six months, and they don’t want to do anything to disrupt its closing. Adding a new product, even though it might make the deal larger, also adds one more thing that might delay the deal closing. The new, unknown or poorly known product, might not work as advertised. As I’ve discussed before, big company salesforces are very poor at selling product where the customer isn’t clamoring for it.

So the typical scenario goes like this: the small acquired company salesforce is sprinkled into the big acquiring company salesforce for a quarter or two to make sure that initial sales happen and so that the farmers learn how to sell the product. After a quarter or two, the hunters will either drift away because they find a new startup opportunity, make the transition to being farmers in their own right (they may have been  at some point in their career anyway), or else they fail to make the transition and end up being laid off.

Posted by Paul McLellan on September 10, 2009 | Comments (3)

September 16, 2009
In response to: Hunters and farmers: EDA salesforces
Jack commented:

This is an interesting analogy. And quite accurate. Most startup types are good at doing what it takes to sell the product and maybe not interested in farming the relationship as they move from sale to sale. And as is usual with acquisitions, some of the sales force gets let go or leaves at shortly after the acquisition. So the hunters in the acquired company, typically focus on finding a new home where hunters are welcome.


September 14, 2009
In response to: Hunters and farmers: EDA salesforces
SteveM commented:

Hi Paul: an apt analogy, but not the only angle. An acquiring company has an existing established sales hierarchy, typically in sales management the organization is very relationship based. Newly acquired sales guy have to try to brown nose their way into the good graces, and the secret handshake is often closely guarded. After that the shelf space for any new fledging product is not available and hard to pursue an incremental deal with a customer and not to disturb the large renewal for his sales management in the coming years. The best way to go is pursue a position in marketing, or as an AE as a way to continue a product technology focus.


September 11, 2009
In response to: Hunters and farmers: EDA salesforces
FPGA Design Engineer commented:

Great analogy! Too many EDA companies today are willing to sell licenses of their tools only to the largest of customers. I recently spoke with an account manager of a well know EDA company that told me he is only interested in customers that do a minimum of $50k of business per year. Given that most small to medium companies will only procure one or two seats of the tools, the $50k per year on a multi-year contract excludes most of them.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows