Subscribe to EDN

So you want to start an EDA company?

February 17, 2010

As I have said repeatedly, the old model for innovation in EDA has died. The old model was largely that venture capitalists would fund teams of engineers, they would produce products to solve some problem that was looming on the horizon, one or two of them would turn out to be the market leaders, the big EDA companies would buy them for significant money and everyone was happy.

This model is broken for all sorts of reasons. The big EDA companies just don’t have the stock valuations and the cash to make acquisitions in the $100Ms. As a result, almost no VC will fund a new EDA company or even put much more money into one that they already have on their hands. Plus, the slow adoption of the most advanced technology and falling design starts make it impossible to justify that type of valuation.

On the other hand, it remains really easy to start an EDA company. Find a problem, get together a few engineers who really understand it, and write some code. If you successfully solve a key problem for the leading edge semiconductor companies, they will buy your product.

Some things work in your favor. Part of the reason that the VC model isn’t working well for EDA is that it isn’t working well in a lot of segments: it just doesn’t cost enough to require VC-level investment. Computers are cheap. Cloud computing means that large capital investment is not required, you can have all the peak compute power and storage for almost nothing. If you are lucky, you may find enough friends, fools and family to invest in your company. Probably you won’t be able to pay anyone until you get your first product far enough along that you have a chance to raise some investment. The key is to keep that investment small, keep the burn rate low and run the company so that a $20M acquisition is attractive. Or that you have the old Metasoft (HSPICE) model of having a small highly profitable EDA company that throws off a lot of cash every year in bonuses, even if you don’t get acquired (although they did in the end when Gerry Hsu sent them an offer that they had 24 hours to accept). VCs disparagingly call these “lifestyle” companies, but if you have 15 people in the company and $10M in revenue that could be quite a lifestyle.

So why am I reiterating all this? Because Jim Hogan and I are leading a discussion on just this topic next Tuesday evening. “So you want to start an EDA company…” at the San Jose Doubletree on February 23 at 6:30-7:30 in the Oak Ballroom (bars are open in the area!). This is during DVcon but you don’t need to be registered to come along.

Posted by Paul McLellan on February 17, 2010 | Comments (3)

February 21, 2010
In response to: So you want to start an EDA company?
Girish Patil commented:

For this very purpose I had a leadership poll and Grass roots poll. The results of this poll should help your discussion. Morale is low. People I mean Engineers would do start up if moral of the industry is high and see growth potential. We need to get these things right prior to any boom for startup scenario.


February 18, 2010
In response to: So you want to start an EDA company?
tomacadence commented:

No doubt, the model for EDA has changed a lot. I blogged about this a while back (tinyurl.com/yalfcjn), remarking about how many small EDA companies, especially in functional verification, are still around after 3, 5, even 10+ years with neither an IPO nor an acquisition. That was almost never the case in the go-go days of EDA. Some of these companies may well serve as templates for those who want to start new EDA ventures in the current environment. Tom Anderson, Cadence


February 17, 2010
In response to: So you want to start an EDA company?
Mike Demler commented:

I think that the so-called lifestyle company is the only type that makes sense as an EDA startup anymore. But just a little addition to the Meta-Software history. We actually did an IPO in 1995, almost exactly 1 year before the sellout to Avant! (Which was motivated by Gerry's purchase of Andrew Yang's Anagram the week before). A large majority of the META stock was held by the Hailey brothers, who built it up from Chapter-S, so it may have been the only public "lifestyle" company in EDA. And what a lifestyle it was! But that's a a story for another day.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows