Subscribe to EDN

EDAC's origins

March 26, 2010

Because I do some consulting for Oasys, I crossed paths with Rick Carlson who is an investor and advisor to them. I hadn’t realized that he was one of the people responsible for getting EDAC going.

In fact, when EDAC started it wasn’t for the whole industry, it was for the smaller EDA companies and actually was called IDAC, for Independent Design Automation Consortium (I’m not quite sure in what way the big companies were “dependent” but it wasn’t a bad name).

It started back in 1987 when Rick was VP sales at EDA Systems (remember them, they did frameworks back when frameworks weren’t called things like OpenAccess) and Dave Millman was at Epic. Almost jokingly they discussed creating an industry consortium before realizing that it was not just a way of passing time over a couple of beers but something that they should actually go out and do.

So they pulled together ten or so small EDA companies into a conference room in San Jose and in 3 or 4 meetings over 6 months started to create IDAC. But they rapidly realized that an industry consortium without the elephants in the living room wasn’t really an industry consortium.

So they pulled together a meeting at the San Jose Jet Center (that Rick’s wife managed, I bet they didn’t pay for the conference room) that was attended by Cadence, Dazix (already drowning), Zycad and others. The first hour didn’t go very well, with nobody really prepared to say anything. Luckily, another of Rick’s investments had been Pete’s Brewing Company and he’d bought along a case of Pete’s Wicked Ale. Time to drink the Kool-Aid, er…beer.

Soon, Joe Costello, as usual, is taking over, laughing and getting everybody rolling. A couple of months later Joe has got everyone there and they are starting to put some substance on what the issues were for EDA as an industry.

But that early promise never really went anywhere. EDAC got hijacked by the marketing managers of each company and took their eye off the big issues. EDAC declined into what it is today: it collects industry data, organizes a few events but doesn’t serve in any real way to raise the consciousness about the big issues affecting EDA as an industry nor doing anything about them.

If you’ve read much of this blog you know that I am very critical of the way that EDA failed to become a strategic partner to its main customers and allowed itself to be pushed down into an expense line in the CAD department budget. The ERP companies like Oracle and SAP manage to extract more dollars from semiconductor companies than does EDA, despite being far less strategically critical. EDAC unfortunately never managed to have any real effect on that.

Posted by Paul McLellan on March 26, 2010 | Comments (2)

April 5, 2010
In response to: EDAC's origins
RZ commented:

The real goal of EDAC once it got set up was to influence DAC. For many years the show portion of DAC funded the IEEE conference which was largely academic and focused on tool developers, not users. The vendors had no influence at all. When EDAC became a partner, there were suddenly tracks set up for users. With revenue sharing and booth discounts for members, the big vendors agreed to move suites from distant hotels, to the auxiliary hall, which helped the small companies by keeping the attendees in the building.


April 2, 2010
In response to: EDAC's origins
A Realist commented:

Unfortunately, EDAC can't do what you want it to do. Discussing business models and how to extract more value from the customers is a great way to get all the people in the room in trouble with anti-trust laws. EDAC can address common problems like piracy, but the moment it crosses over into things that impact pricing, it is at high risk of breaking the law. Oracle extracts its prices because it is a dominate #1. From Oracle's website "Continues to hold more market share than its six closest competitors combined" I can promise you if one EDA vendor got to this market dominance, they'd extract more value from the customer too. I'm sure SAP's marketshare is similar. Consortiums, by their nature, have a limited set of things they can accomplish. I think EDAC does a pretty good job at what it can do.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows