Subscribe to EDN

A Place for Graphene Memory?

September 11, 2009

An article in EE Times by R. Colin Johnson brings back the name of programmable pioneer Zvi Or-Bach, founder of eASIC and Chip Express. Or-Bach’s newest startup, NuPGA, uses graphene, a form of graphite, as the programmable memory element in an FPGA. Gartner senior analyst for FPGAs, Dean Freeman, credited the company as being among many in the programmable architecture field relying on “innovative, creative thinking.”

Or-Bach was smart to tap into the nanomaterials work of Rice University Prof. James Tour, who told Johnson in all frankness that graphene could not take on standard memory processes until sub-10-nm feature sizes become common after 2015. But there’s the problem.

Many “innovative, creative thinkers” were left as road kill in the brutal environment of 2008-09.  Venture funding will not revive quickly, nor will OEMs’ willingness to look at new FPGA architectures.  Unless Or-Bach is ready to keep NuPGA rolling for several years on the basis of angel funding, this could be a hard road up.

The company appears to be targeting ruggedized applications in space and terrestrial mil-aero applications.  NuPGA had better talk to Actel Corp. and others on the tough task of establishing a customer base among military contractors.  And it had better be prepared for a difficult struggle in establishing carbon-based memory.

Posted by FPGA Gurus on September 11, 2009 | Comments (3)

April 16, 2010
In response to: A Place for Graphene Memory?
Buy Cialis commented:

trendsbut unstructured rupees clause rename aerospace mitochondria provincial gadgets frustrating estimate


January 27, 2010
In response to: A Place for Graphene Memory?
FunnyDevil commented:

Pretty nice site you've got here. Thank you for it. I like such topics and everything that is connected to them. BTW, why don't you change design :).


September 23, 2009
In response to: A Place for Graphene Memory?
bff commented:

Space qualified is a high margin, but highly risk adverse place to go after with new technology. You can not replace the part once launched. No company will take the risk, unless it is the only technology that can possibly do what they are trying to do. Get ready for at least 5 years of testing before they will let it fly. This is a terrible business plan.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows