Subscribe to EDN

Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation

September 3, 2008

While many of us were slipping out last Friday to gain an early start on out three-day Labor Day weekends here in the United States, Illinois-based Motorola filed a form with the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) detailing a possible and generous compensation package for co-CEO Greg Brown if the company’s mobile devices business is taken public with a market capitalization above $2 billion.

Brown, who heads Moto’s broadband mobility solutions business and already is slated to rake in some $10 million in 2008 base salary/annual bonus/special bonus/long-term incentive plan pay, would be able to purchase shares of Motorola common stock of a value of $3.33 million and restricted stock of $1.67 million if such a $2 billion deal were to go through.

The agreement, while very generous for an executive who just took control of the company in January, only rewards Brown is the then spun out company maintains a certain stock price. Meanwhile, Brown’s package is pocket change compared to the estimated value of co-CEO Sanjay Jha’s nearly $100 million package. Reports claim that the Moto mobile devices business unit leader has a contradictory sort of package that will pay him $94 million if the spin-off succeeds, but will pay him $30 million if it doesn’t, by October 31, 2010.

So while Jha stands to take home a much heftier reward if the cell phone unit spin-off flies by Halloween 2010, he still stays out of the poorhouse if it doesn’t. Stockholders must be spooked.

Then again, considering all that Jha has to do with the unit, that may have been the only way the ex-Qualcomm exec would take the job (which he did just last month). Faced with a failing unit and a fallen-from-grace brand that in Q2 Gartner data shows lost a third of its market share year over year and claimed only 10% of worldwide cell phone sales, Jha also has to re-staff the unit which has been hemorrhaging executives. As the Wall Street Journal pointed out this morning, between Moto’s layoffs and mass exodus of mobile execs, staffing is now key for Jha’s and the mobile devices business’ success. 

What do you think? Are these packages inline with the work set out before the two co-CEOs or are they being overly compensated? Voice your opinion below.

–Suzanne Deffree, Managing Editor, News

Posted by Suzanne Deffree on September 3, 2008 | Comments (13)

January 18, 2010
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
Robert Shumake commented:

Just wanted to say that I read your blog quite frequently and I'm always amazed at some of the stuff people post here. But keep up the good work, it's always interesting. See ya,


November 11, 2009
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
Peter Green commented:

This brings to mind this thing my father pretty much always said... Of course its definitely not appropriate right now...


September 29, 2009
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
Online Stock Trading commented:

Your blog is so informative ? ..I just bookmarked you....keep up the good work!!!!


September 24, 2009
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
Candice Redfern commented:

I don?t usually reply to posts but I will in this case, great info...I will add a backlink and bookmark your site. Keep up the good work!


September 1, 2009
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
Tony in Chicago commented:

These people are not superstars with a Superman costume under their business clothes - they are just (perhaps) above average engineers or business people who put on their pants one leg at a time just like normal people. Maybe they will be lucky with a bit of talent to have Moto rise from the ashes. But there is no way they are worth this kind of cash, compared to the meager salaries paid to the key engineers, industrial designers, marketing people, and managers who will be even more responsible if they manage to pull it off. The RAZR, which saved Moto's ass some years ago is a case in point - it was created by a small team of innovative people mentioned, and delivered in spite of the efforts by upper management inside Moto that thought it would never fly. Guess who got paid big bonus bucks for that one? But it is so in US economy that the elite (in any business - sports, entertainment, banking, ...) get bucks at huge multiples of what even our most innovative engineers and managers make. That is how the system is designed, and even the lowliest worker in our great country somehow thinks this is the American Way so it is OK.


September 9, 2008
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
SOS commented:

Why should ANYONE get 100 million dollars? Or 30 million for not doing anything?? NO ONE is THAT good! I can't understand shy the BOD's continue to offer these perverse salaries/packages, except out of their own self-interest. Rest assured, the average employee is having to buy his own office supplies due to continual budget cutbacks. Can you imagine how many engineers (you know, those folks who do the work, solve the problems and create products) could be hired for the salaries that they pay these hedonist yahoos? I'm OK with billionaires who build their company from the ground up. But these guys are nothing more than hit-and-run profiteers, with no interest in long term results. This is yet another example of why good capitaliist Americans are hating the corporations more and more...


September 4, 2008
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
MGM commented:

This is a great example of how a few individuals profit greatly at the expense of others. Spin it off, make lots of money for a couple guys that does nothing for the workers or the community in which they live. It might not be criminal, but it is certainly immoral.


September 4, 2008
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
KGV commented:

This is way over generous because no results have been delivered. No wonder MOT has lost its mojo.


September 4, 2008
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
Malav commented:

I donot care what the executives makes so long as stocks does great. To make money, one need to spend money. Remember cheap things are expensive!!! Need Best in calss Management & Engs for Best in class return and for that ....one need to pay best in ...calss. Everybody wins this way !!!!


September 4, 2008
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
Clinton commented:

The huge compensation to CEO is exactly why Motorola and many other big corporates get into this kind of situation to begin with. I see a conspiracy brewing here. Maybe SEC or DOJ should launch an investigation into the deal behind the scene.


September 4, 2008
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
Mike commented:

What qualifications does Jha has for the job? He really never built anything and less than 7 years ago was an engineer. The BOD is insane.


September 4, 2008
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
Keith commented:

They are completely over compensated. Brown gets rewarded for shedding a business he knows nothing about. I can only assume the reward is intended to keep Brown from spinning off Mobile Devices without enough money to survive. As for Jha, he has a no-lose contract worth at least $30M! Where is the incentive for him to succeed? Who wouldn't accept that job? The Mot BOD is criminal IMO.


September 4, 2008
In response to: Moto’s mobile spinout and co-CEO contradictory compensation
Postage commented:

Run for the hills, they have begun to paint the pig with the shareholders money.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows