Subscribe to EDN

IBM reaches for cloud with possible Sun acquisition

March 18, 2009

The Wall Street Journal today reported that IBM may soon bid $6.5 billion in cash for Sun Microsystems.

Such a price would represent a 100% premium over Sun’s Tuesday close price and would make the acquisition IBM’s largest buy in its history.

Sun, according to the WSJ article, has been shopping itself around. The company has been struggling for some time and in recent quarters put its focus on lower cost servers and software, while still showing success with Java.

IBM has had a few less-than-stellar quarters, but is far from struggling. With some $13 billion in cash, it could easily afford the rumored Sun buy. Big Blue, as exampled by its ThinkPad line sale to Lenovo in 2005, has been moving away from hardware and putting its focus on software and services.

The WSJ sources "people familiar with the matter" in its report. As a reporter, I can tell you people truly familiar with a matter, meaning those high enough to know what they are talking about, rarely leak information unless they want it leaked. And I find it very suspicious that the WSJ just happened to land the story the same day that Sun announced its cloud computing plans here in New York at its CommunityOne conference.

Some Sun watchers believe that clouds, both public and private, could lead to a bright future for the company’s technologies. While much of Sun’s cloud details are still to be released, the company is seemingly well prepared for its market entrance with secure, inexpensive, and readily available cloud-enablement software, virtualization technologies, and open source technologies that host and manage software stacks for virtual machines.

Sun’s announcements today are solid, but still come late to the cloud game. HP, for one, has already announced its cloud strategy. Microsoft has done so, too. And IBM is one of the forerunners here. A Sun buy would bolster IBM’s presence and provide it with more tech muscle (and more potential customer lists) to battle its rivals.

Cloud isn’t the only attractive attribute Sun has. The traditional server aspect of the possible acquisition is significant, so much so that an obstacle to such an acquisition could be antitrust authorities. Based on revenue, a combined IBM/Sun entity would have an approximate 65% stake in the Unix server space, leaving only HP as a formidable near-term rival. Beyond Unix, it would have an approximate 42% stake in the total server market. These are the types of numbers that make antitrust authorities break out their magnifying glasses and look at every detail of a deal.

As a reminder, there’s no guarantee that such a deal would even get past both companies’ boards. And as nothing has been formally announced by either company, any acquisition is far off at this point. Of course that hasn’t kept Wall Street from placing its bets. On the rumors, as well as Sun’s cloud news, Sun’s stock, JAVA, was up more than 80% by 2:15pm eastern today trading at $8.97. IBM, meanwhile was down more than 2% to $90.99.

What do you think? Would such a deal go through? Does Sun technology hold cloud value for IBM? Share your thoughts below. 

*Editor’s note: FYI, I do not own any tech stock. It is considered unethical for a journalist to hold stock in what they report on.

Posted by Suzanne Deffree on March 18, 2009 | Comments (3)

April 3, 2009
In response to: IBM reaches for cloud with possible Sun acquisition
John commented:

It is interesting to ask; why is Linux that successful? It's tech is not that good, there are better open source OSes; BSD, Solaris. Linux is not the only open source OS. There are other, better. Solaris is cheaper than Linux too. So, why does Linux get all attention and all success? Well, after long research I know the answer! Seriously, I mean it. I know. Read this link carefully. It is not FUD or lies. Everything is true, these are well documented facts. www.natall.com/who-rules-america/index.html This is well documented, there are lots of articles covering this in big newspapers. For instance. (Read the comments!!! People agree on this!) www.latimes.com/news/opinion/sunday/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,1,7113597.column Or this one: www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1191257286817&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull Or this one: www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/Media_Cover_Israel.html And they are also controlling finance as much as media. Or even more. And the thing is, they created RedHat and recently bought, SuSE. And SUN has always had lots of customers in finance. But suddenly, they who control finance (banks, etc) naturally only buy from RedHat and SuSE. They buy from their own kin. Look at Hollywood, the majority of stars are of their kin. Why do Hollywood always make movies about the Holocaust or the Nazis, but no other exterminations? They control Hollywood. That is fact, even Marlon Brando said so. Marlon Brando complained on the Larry King Live show on april 5th 1996 that, "Hollywood is run by Jews - it is owned by Jews!". Proof: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marlon_Brando#Comments_on_Jews_and_Hollywood Read about their power: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Israel_Public_Affairs_Committee online.wsj.com/article/SB123672847973688515.html?mod=googlenews_wsj And: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Findley But: www.israelshamir.net/English/Eng37.htm And: www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/09/israel-foreign-ministry-media You see? The proofs are numerous. They also control finance even more. That is a fact. And SUN had many finance customers. But not anymore. RedHat gets all the new finance orders, without asking. The reason Linux is successful, is because they can build a company around Linux and sell it. They can not build a company around BSD or Solaris. Spread the word: You should not angry them. That has SUN did. Cooperate with them. Dont fight them. That is stupid. With coop SUN could have survived.


March 19, 2009
In response to: IBM reaches for cloud with possible Sun acquisition
TomF commented:

As one who attended the CommunityOne event in NYC yesterday (March 18), I think that Sun''s could computing initiative is solid. On the other hand, I just don''t see a Sun-IBM merger. We are talking 2 companies with very different cultures. IBM tends to gather the best brains on a slew of tech issues. But, I just don''t see them do a good job of follow-through. Over the years, Sun followed an innovative and practical approach focused on transitioning the best of ''bleeding edge'' computer technology to solid products. OPen Solaris is just an example of that.


March 18, 2009
In response to: IBM reaches for cloud with possible Sun acquisition
Carlos commented:

I think it will go through and it will be a huge benefit for IBM, it will add value to the company. Do you remember when Microsoft took the lead in the DOS operating system that caused a lot of troubles to IBM? Well, that could be the revenge from IBM by attacking Microsoft super profitable Office suit with Sun''s Open Office. I think we will catch the benefit of this acquisition.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows