Subscribe to EDN

How Google plans to up server power efficiency (nope, it’s not digital power…)

June 13, 2007

Most of the publicity in the last day or two about Google’s and Intel’s spearheading an industry initiative to increase computing power efficiency has stated that the goal is at least 90% efficiency for power supplies, but there hasn’t been much (any?) explanation of how this goal is to be met. Well, at last year’s IDF, Google Lab engineers presented their Simple Plan to increase efficiency. This is the gist of it:

Current computers and servers that descend from the original IBM PC of 1981 have power supply specifications that mandate multiple voltages: +/-12V, 5V, and 3.3V, resulting in four distinct supplies, when all you really need is one 12V supply and then sprinkle around some voltage regulator modules (VRMs) on the motherboard to create lower voltages as needed.

Google claims, and it’s easily believable, that this change increases power efficiency to 85% at virtually no cost. By using “higher-quality components,” the efficiency goes to 90%.  

Google says the change is at “virtually no cost,” but I’d guess that it’s actually a cost savings. Look at the picture of a typical 4-in-1 power supply here:

 
4 voltages in one power supply

…versus a single voltage power supply here (this is the 85% efficiency version):


single voltage supply

Posted by Margery Conner on June 13, 2007 | Comments (5)

July 15, 2007
In response to: How Google plans to up server power efficiency (nope, it’s not digital power…)
Fred commented:

Google - could just bypass this exercise and switch to Ablecom PSU's. SuperMicro servers have been using these for years. A number of Ablecom PSU's have confirmed efficiencies of 85% & above. SuperMicro's new blade server once configured correctly will yield PSU efficiencies upto 93%. Food for thought?


June 25, 2007
In response to: How Google plans to up server power efficiency (nope, it’s not digital power…)
Alvaius commented:

I am with Slash... 24 volt may make sense. Even the AC-DC power conversion of a 24 volt output would be easier to achieve. 3V out of a 240V supply would tend to be on the lossy side.


June 21, 2007
In response to: How Google plans to up server power efficiency (nope, it’s not digital power…)
New user commented:

This discussion is a bit absurd and a good example of "you can''t believe everything you read".


June 20, 2007
In response to: How Google plans to up server power efficiency (nope, it’s not digital power…)
Slash commented:

The amperage and wire diameter needed to run the enire system on 3.3V would be insane. Low DC voltages have very high loss in just a few inches of wire. 24VDC would be more efficient still if you could get the whole industry to switch all fans and CD, DVD, and hard drive spindle motors to it.


June 20, 2007
In response to: How Google plans to up server power efficiency (nope, it’s not digital power…)
RE: Duh... commented:

Don't forget that many CD-ROM and Hard Drives also need that 12V to run the mechanical portions of them. Not only that, but the efficiency of small SMT switchers going from 12V to 2.5,1.8,1.5,1.2...etc are much greater than the efficiency of the main PC supply. Until you can get all the peripherals to stop using 12V that's what your stuck with.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows