Subscribe to EDN

More on Boston Power’s lithium ion battery

July 2, 2008

After reading Lithium-ion batteries prepare to take a giant leap forward, a helpful reader (thanks, Rich!) pointed out the excellent article that ran in the March IEEE Spectrum on battery entrepreneur and Boston Power founder Christina Lampe-Onnerud, The Lady and the li-ion. The article has a good explanation of Boston Power’s Sonata serial battery pack architecture:

Boston Power Battery pack architecture“[Laptop battery packs] consist of six cylindrical cells, arranged as pairs wired in parallel, with three sets of parallel cells wired in series. Lampe-Onnerud sketched out a design with three rectangular cells instead, each filling the space of two cylindrical cells, all wired in a series. … In the [traditional] parallel laptop battery, current is supposed to flow through the parallel paths at exactly the same rate. But slight temperature differences or tiny chemical imbalances between the two paths force more current into one of them. Over time, the current imbalance between the cells can go to an extreme that forces bits of lithium metal to adhere to the anode. When this happens, the battery is able to store less energy than it is designed to store, meaning a shorter computer run time per charge. And because lithium metal is highly reactive, those scattered bits of metal can fuel a fire if a short crops up and suddenly raises the temperature of the system.”

Lampe-Onnerud also went into detail in our conversation about the importance of controlling side chemical reactions in the cells. Unfortunately, I was able to use her description in the short 500-word EDN article, so here it is for further background on the Boston Power battery’s “secret sauce”:

"[The Sonata’s superior performance and increased cycle life] is because we have changed the cathode and fine-tuned the anode and the electrolyte. In a battery you have about 50 chemicals, and those chemicals are either inert or active. So if you can fine-tune the electrochemical reactions happening in parallel with [the purely] chemical reactions to only be useful reactions, you basically win. It sounds easy, but it’s proved to be very difficult. What we have done is fine-tune cobalt and manganese on the cathode with graphite on the anode. And we have carefully picked the inert chemical because the truth is there are really no inert chemicals — They are all somewhat reactive. But in the voltage window where we are, they have very, very limited activity, and that’s why we get the high cycle life."

Note that Lampe-Onnerud doesn’t claim any incredible chemical breakthrough, just grinding-it-out, careful tweaking of the already-known lithium ion formulation. Which gives you pause about all the attention placed on lithium ion batteries in plug-in hybrid autos: lithium ion batteries are no silver bullet. However, careful design and matching of battery cell characteristics to the application power-use curves can get us farther down the path. Take note, if you’re going after McCain’s $300M prize.

Posted by Margery Conner on July 2, 2008 | Comments (3)

August 20, 2008
In response to: More on Boston Power’s lithium ion battery
small_rcer commented:

Cell balancing is not new but does not appear to be commonly used in computer applications. We use cell balancing extensively with the very high capacity Lithium Polymer batteries. The cells are balanced during charging. At the end of the charge the cells have the same voltage within 20-50 millivolts. The ones that peak first are not overcharged as the cell balancer shunts the charging current past the fully charged cells. See the "Blinky" product at astroflight.com


July 3, 2008
In response to: More on Boston Power’s lithium ion battery
Zepp commented:

Cells in parallel aren't really the issue. If one cell's capacity reduces, it's resistance rises faster in charging cycles which lets more current go into neighbor cells. Same for discharge: the voltage of the cell with less capacity drops faster, which lets the neighbor cell take more of the current load. In both situations the neighbor cells ages faster until both cells are of equal capacity again. Contrary with cells in series, here the weak one (less capacity) gets the hit: when charging gets overcharged before the other cells are full; when discharging it gets sucked empty or even reverse polarized before the other cells are empty - both further damaging the weak cells. Does the lady really master the L-Ion?


July 2, 2008
In response to: More on Boston Power’s lithium ion battery
JIM commented:

Azmat, those solutions do not sound likely to be power efficient.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows