Subscribe to EDN

More on MIT demo of wireless power

June 15, 2007

Physorg has a little more information on the MIT team’s use of resonant induction to transmit power. One of the comments seems to refute the notion that the device being charged would have to be precisely aligned: “As long as the laptop is in a room equipped with a source of such wireless power, it would charge automatically,” which is good.

Wireless power coils
However, two major constraints still seem to remain: The size of the coils which limits the range of power transmission, and efficiency.  Take a look at the two coupled coils powering the light bulb: It looks like the range is about 2x the diameter of the coils. And since laptops are getting smaller, not bigger, it would limit range of transmission. And why the coy discussion of efficiency? The article, not quoting any of the team members, says,  power can be transferred “omni-directionally and efficiently over room-sized distances.” And quoting a team member, “The usual non-resonant magnetic induction would be almost 1 million times less efficient in this particular system.” Yes, but the usual non-resonant magnetic induction would be completely useless, and a million times useless is still pretty inefficient. Let’s see some cold hard numbers on efficiency.

Posted by Margery Conner on June 15, 2007 | Comments (4)

June 20, 2008
In response to: More on MIT demo of wireless power
J.Rockel commented:

While this may not be new, there have been few demonstrated applications. Like many "inventions" it needs development for practical use.


June 28, 2007
In response to: More on MIT demo of wireless power
ChrisK commented:

Oh, you mean that newfangled Tesla Coil?


June 19, 2007
In response to: More on MIT demo of wireless power
Art Galvan commented:

Fasar Inc had a magnetic induction circuit that coupled energy at 98% Effcy. this could be done here with proper design of the coils.


June 19, 2007
In response to: More on MIT demo of wireless power
RF Guy commented:

Why is anyone making such a big deal about a technique that has been around for many years? There is nothing new about the "discovery" as far as I can see. Simple physics is all that you need to understand the limitations as well as performance that can be achieved. It is all about the coupling coefficient and Q''s of the resonators.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows