Subscribe to EDN

With a name like “Phoenix” how can you count it out?

November 11, 2008

Mission managers for the Phoenix Mars lander said that after a week of no response from the lander, the Phoenix was probably defunct. The orbiting spacecraft will continue to listen for a few more weeks, but expectations are that the lander is permanently silent.

Phoenix-Mars landerHowever, come next Martian spring, NASA will try to revive the Phoenix again, but according to an article in the NYTimes, “…the expectation is that the spacecraft’s electronics will not survive the long, deep freeze.”

How likely is it that Phoenix will rise from the ashes of a Martian winter? In last June’s post on this topic, Really low temperatures for a lithium ion battery,   Bill Yalen, lead project engineer with Yardney Technical Products, the manufacturer of the Phoenix’s lithium ion battery pack, said    “We have hard-frozen Li-ion cells in the past and verified that they could be thawed and recover. To do that, however, they should be at medium state of charge, whereas the Phoenix battery would presumably have discharged deeply due to lack of solar power…[italics added].”

According to the article, the Phoenix experienced this discharged-battery scenario: “…on Oct. 27, just after Phoenix finished its last major experiment analyzing Martian soil, an unexpected dust storm hit. The batteries, already low from running the experiment, ran out of energy. The spacecraft first put itself into a low-energy “safe mode,” then fell silent. It revived itself on Oct. 30, but, with the dust still swirling, was never able to fully recharge its batteries. Each day, the solar panels would generate enough electricity for the spacecraft to wake up, but then the batteries drained again."

Hope springs eternal, but the odds of the Phoenix rising for the next Martian spring don’t look so good.

Here are the links to the PowerSource three-part series on the Phoenix:

Power on Mars Part 1: Dust devils clean up solar arrays

Power on Mars Part 2: The likelihood of Phoenix rising from the frozen ashes

Power on Mars Part 3: *Really* low temperatures for a lithium ion battery

Posted by Margery Conner on November 11, 2008 | Comments (2)

November 11, 2008
In response to: With a name like “Phoenix” how can you count it out?
aaronkoo commented:

looks like nasa''''s FMECA wasn''''t not fully cover.... there should be a sensor to sense the dust level and a cleaning machanism to clear those dust off the panels...


November 11, 2008
In response to: With a name like “Phoenix” how can you count it out?
jeeshenlee commented:

"Each day, the solar panels would generate enough electricity for the spacecraft to wake up, but then the batteries drained again" Why not NASA play at the safe side to reserve enough of energy or monitor the avaiability of solar energy before waking up the system?

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows