Subscribe to EDN

Teasing out a poor country’s economic statistics from satellite photos of nighttime lighting

August 19, 2009

Economists have a problem when they attempt to track the economy of a poor country: Accurate statistics are hard to come by. Either the numbers are unreliable or the government itself is unreliable – for whatever reason, it’s difficult to monitor the economic health of a poor country. Yet economic indicators are important to know if conditions are improving or deteriorating.

Researchers at Brown University decided to forego relying on the country’s government for economic numbers and turned instead to satellite pictures showing a country’s use of artificial lighting. Here’s an article in New Scientist detailing the study. There are several comments from readers following the article, with some of the commenters questioning the validity of the approach because variability in efficiency of lighting used would be too great.

Several months ago I posted about research presented by  Jeff Tsao, a researcher at Sandia National Labs who posited that, because light has historically been a fixed percentage of the world’s GDP, increasing lighting efficiency will result in more lighting used, rather than a decrease in power usage. This is called, among other things, the Rebound Effect.

Here’s the interesting part that relates directly to the Brown University method of measuring a country’s economic health: There’s a direct link between a country’s gross domestic product (GDP) and lighting. Over the past 300 years the world has spent a constant 0.72% of its GDP on artificial lighting. So, Tsao’s research would seem to support tracking lighting use from space as a valid economic indicator. The Rebound Effect isn’t mentioned in the New Scientist article, and the paper is behind a subscription wall so I can’t tell if the Brown researchers cover it.

(To learn more about lighting efficiency and solid-state lighting, register here to attend EDN’s Designing with LEDs Workshop in Chicago on October 6, 2009.)

From the New Scientist photos page, here is a nighttime satellite photo of the US:

 
USA nighttime lighting

… Europe as well as Northern Africa:

 
Europe and N Africa nightime lighting

…and  Asia. What’s missing for all three is on overlay of population densities.

  
Asia nightime lighting

Posted by Margery Conner on August 19, 2009 | Comments (7)

August 26, 2009
In response to: Teasing out a poor country’s economic statistics from satellite photos of nighttime lighting
Bryan commented:

No wonder, I can't hardly see the Milky Way anymore and enjoy the stars.


August 26, 2009
In response to: Teasing out a poor country’s economic statistics from satellite photos of nighttime lighting
craigk commented:

The lights at night would also appear to be a good indicator of wasteful societies. Why do we need lights in places unoccupied by humans? Leaving the lights on for someone is an unnecessary, uncaring, convention often not appreciated by the light recipient.


August 25, 2009
In response to: Teasing out a poor country’s economic statistics from satellite photos of nighttime lighting
Tom commented:

I worked at one point on the DMSP program (the source of the "lights at night" photos) - The lights are each created by cities, and are somewhat false in their appearance, as they futzed with gains to make smaller towns show up brighter, etc. Anyway, the story - notice that from - call it St Louis to the west, the lights appear to be in a very regularly-spaced grid? I don't know the real truth, but I'm told that those lights are just about exactly one-day's ride by pony express.


August 25, 2009
In response to: Teasing out a poor country’s economic statistics from satellite photos of nighttime lighting
Navy Nuke commented:

Canadian, By that conclusion and estimation, the world's oceans would need the most aid, more then any other nation.


August 25, 2009
In response to: Teasing out a poor country’s economic statistics from satellite photos of nighttime lighting
Canadian commented:

Look at the map of the US again, specifically that dark blob to the North. I suggest more foreign aid be sent to Canada.


August 21, 2009
In response to: Teasing out a poor country’s economic statistics from satellite photos of nighttime lighting
Jesse Thomas commented:

Interesting pictures, but I'm not sure about making the correlation between economic status, political philosophy or other affiliations. But I'll be willing to bet that the correlation might be more closely matched to those who leave the lights on, and who work for, or benefit from the government because of the moral hazard associated with living off of other peoples' money.


August 20, 2009
In response to: Teasing out a poor country’s economic statistics from satellite photos of nighttime lighting
Tom in Silicon Valley commented:

Another interesting correlation is that lighting patterns in the U.S. correspond almost exactly with voting patterns in U.S. elections. Lighted areas tend to vote Democratic, dark areas tend to vote Republican. If you overlay a county-by-county map of election results on the satellite photo, they will closely match, with only a few exceptions.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows