Subscribe to EDN

Fujitsu launches USB 3.0 SATA bridge chip for PC external storage devices

July 27, 2009

Semiconductor vendors continue to sniff carefully at the USB 3.0 market. The opportunity has a flame-like attraction: it seems inevitable that the 3.0 standard, with its 5 Gbit/s transfer rate, will eventually replace the 480 Mbit/s 2.0 standard in most PC applications. But no one is sure about the rate of adoption. And it is clear that Intel will put a 3.0 host device in their core logic at some point in the future, and no one wants to still be recovering their investment on a host chip when that happens. To further complicate things, the 3.0 PHY, as a more demanding superset of the PCI Express gen 2 PHY, is a complex silicon design that requires a lot of development and verification time. So for the chip developer it’s a big bet on an uncertain table.

This has not prevented some companies from moving quickly. Fujitsu Microelectronics, for one, was an early designer of a 3.0 PHY in their proprietary 65 nm technology, claiming to be the first vendor to demonstrate interoperability, and demonstrating 200 MByte/s transfers at the Intel Developers’ Forum in Tokyo this May. But Fujitsu has not introduced a host controller. Instead, the company is cherry-picking applications on the device side of the USB cable.

Today they announced a prime example: a 3.0 to SATA bridge chip. The device is intended, obviously, as a connection between a USB 3.0 cable and a SATA external storage device. It incorporates an AES encryption engine—critical to many external-media applications—and Fujitsu claims the chip can support 300 MByte/s throughput with flow-through encryption/decryption.

Internally, the device includes USB 3.0 Revision 1.0 and 2.0 PHY and link-layer blocks. As have most design teams, Fujitsu chose to implement entirely separate 3.0 and 2.0 paths rather than to get clever about combining them, even though it doesn’t appear that there is any situation in which this chip would have to operate in both modes simultaneously. There is also a 3 Gbit/s SATA Gen2i PHY and link layer, of course.

Structurally, the chip includes an internal bus for data movement, the AES engine, and an unspecified 32-bit microprocessor core with attendant SRAM. The CPU’s job is primarily system control functions within the chip, such as initialization, dispatching tasks to the AES engine, and handling the intervention-required bits of the two link-layer protocols. The RAM is for code and data storage for the CPU rather than for buffering purposes, according to Fujitsu director of business development Davy Yoshida. The chip also includes an SPI port to an external serial Flash chip for boot-loading of code, and some general-purpose I/O pins for such things as status LEDs.

Power is going to be an issue in several respects for users of the device. The chip requires both 1.2V and 3.3V supplies, and consumes 550 mW typical. That means that a bus-powered interface with a local regulator to step the USB supply pin down to the required voltages would already be eating up most of the 900 mA allowed during operation, without passing any power on to the mass storage device. So interfaces using the chip will pretty well require an external power supply of some sort, probably furnished by the storage device. Further, according to Fujitsu, the chip’s USB I/O pins are not high-voltage tolerant, so they may require external protection circuitry to comply with the letter of the 3.0 specification about tolerating shorts to the power pin. One major bright spot for board-level designers, however, is that the chip has an internal spread-spectrum clock generator and so can operate with only a single external crystal.

Fujitsu is predicting that we will be seeing USB 3.0 in a variety of areas in addition to external storage. The company is looking hard at applications in both automotive infotainment and consumer electronics, for example. So don’t be surprised to see the company’s PHY surface in some additional bridge chips in the near future, and get included, perhaps in a more compact 40 nm form, in forthcoming consumer and automotive SoCs.

Posted by Ron Wilson on July 27, 2009 | Comments (4)

March 29, 2010
In response to: Fujitsu launches USB 3.0 SATA bridge chip for PC external storage devices
sarahbelll commented:

I don't think I have seen this described in such an informative way before. You really have cleared this up for me. Thank you!


November 9, 2009
In response to: Fujitsu launches USB 3.0 SATA bridge chip for PC external storage devices
Stellar Data recovery commented:

You have Nice updates in your blog, i am really interested in your blog. I have more than 10 blogs, 4 directories, and 12 sites with resource pages. I want make your blog more popular by adding your blog link to my sites, in exchange my one link to your blog. My website is on data recovery services. www.stellarinfo.co.in This will be useful for us to get more popularity. Please reply me in a positive way on birellar@gmail.com, I am looking forward. Thanks & Regards Birendra singh


November 5, 2009
In response to: Fujitsu launches USB 3.0 SATA bridge chip for PC external storage devices
birendra singh commented:

Nice update, I am willing to be regular reader of your blog. I belong to Data Recovery company In Delhi, so I have big interest in Computer related updates, we deal to recover lost data from computer hard disk and all other storage medias. www.datarecoverydelhi.in


July 28, 2009
In response to: Fujitsu launches USB 3.0 SATA bridge chip for PC external storage devices
BSEE commented:

You wrote that the chip "consumes 550 mW typical. That means that a bus-powered interface with a local regulator to step the USB supply pin down to the required voltages would already be eating up most of the 900 mA allowed during operation, without passing any power on to the mass storage device" The conclusion does not follow from the data you provided. If the USB supply is 5V, which one would expect for backward compatibility, then the source can supply 900mA * 5V = 4500mW. So 550mW won't be "most" of the power, only a little more than a tenth. Even if the USB supply is 3V, then 900mA * 3V = 2700mW available, and 550mW is still only a fifth of the power available, not "most". DC to DC regulators should be 70 percent efficient minimum, with 90 percent more likely. Perhaps there are typographical errors in the article?

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows