# PCB’s top ground plane and its effect on a microstrip line’s characteristic impedance

**Introduction**

_{r}. Two questions are addressed in this study; does the impedance stay fairly constant from IF to RF frequencies, and what effect does the gap between the microstrip line and the top ground plane have on the transmission line’s characteristic impedance, Z

_{0}?

**Figure 1 A typical microstrip line scenario.**

**Frequency dependence of a microstrip line with a top ground plane**

The first case investigated had the following parameters:

The parameters given above should correspond to a microstrip line with characteristic impedance, Z_{0} of 50 Ω. Figure 2 shows the relationship between the transmission line’s characteristic impedance, Z_{0} , and the operating frequency. The lowest frequency analyzed in this study was 100 MHz. The variation of Z_{0} between 100 MHz and 2 GHz is only 0.7 Ω, which is negligible for most practical applications. The 0.7 W change in the transmission line’s impedance would result in a VSWR of 1.014, or a reflection coefficient S_{11} of -43.2 dB. However, when the gap G in Figure 1 is varied from 10 mils to 40 mils (0.5 to 2 times the microstrip line width, W) the change in characteristic impedance Z_{0} is 1.9 Ω. The largest variation in Z_{0} occurs when the gap, G, becomes significantly smaller than the line’s width, hence resulting in coplanar waveguide mode.

**Figure 2. Microstrip impedance as a function of frequency for different PCB top-layer ground gaps for a thin PCB substrate (10 mils).**

The second case analyzed had the following parameters:

The characteristic impedance varies from 78 Ω to 104 Ω when the gap G is varied from 10 mils to 40 mils. Therefore, varying the gap, G, between the microstrip line and the top ground plane has a greater effect on varying the desired transmission line impedance than the variation caused by increasing frequency of operation.

For example, the characteristic impedance Z

_{0}of the transmission line differs by 26.5 Ω at 2 GHz when a gap of 10 mils is compared to a gap of 40 mils. This great variation will result in a substantial VSWR and correspondingly bad return loss.

**Figure 3. Microstrip impedance as a function of frequency for different PCB top-layer ground gaps for a thin PCB substrate (60 mils).**

**Next: The effect of the gap**

System level design and integration challenges with multiple ADCs on single chip

Understanding the basics of setup and hold time

Product How-to: Digital isolators offer easy-to-use isolated USB option

Managing noise in the signal chain, Part 2: Noise and distortion in data converters

War of currents: Tesla vs Edison

Simple reverse-polarity-protection circuit has no voltage drop

Control an LM317T with a PWM signal

Start with the right op amp when driving SAR ADCs

Currently no items