# Error compensation improves bipolar-current sinks

Click here to download a PDF |

You can improve a current sink's accuracy by at least two orders of magnitude by adding two standard 1%-tolerance resistors. As a bonus, you also compensate for errors that a low-current-gain pass transistor's base current introduces. To do so, you measure the transistor's base current and add a proportionally scaled error term to the source's reference voltage. When you design a current sink, you can use a MOSFET for the sink's pass transistor because of its nearly infinite power gain and low gate current. However, a high-power MOSFET presents high input and output capacitances that reduce the sink's high-frequency output impedance.

As an alternative, a low-current-gain, bipolar power transistor presents a much lower output capacitance than does a MOSFET of comparable power ratings. Figure 1 shows a design for a bipolar-transistor-based current sink that unfortunately suffers from accuracy errors due to Q_{1}'s base current's flowing into the current-measurement resistor R_{1}. The base current varies with changes in Q_{1}'s collector current and current gain, which in turn depend on Q_{1}'s production tolerances, junction temperature, and collector-emitter voltage.

**Figure 1** This typical quickly responding constant-current sink uses a bipolar transistor but suffers from base-current-induced error. Its normal output current is I_{OUT}=(V_{REF}/R_{1})-I_{B}.

You can use a Darlington transistor to increase the circuit's current gain and reduce the output error, but few Darlington transistors offer good high-frequency parameters. Superbeta power transistors are rare, have typically lower unity-gain-bandwidth frequencies, and are more expensive. In other words, even though a bipolar transistor presents higher output impedance at high frequencies, the error from its base current makes it a poor choice for a high-precision current sink. You could compensate for base-current errors by measuring the output transistor's collector current and introducing a correction factor, but that approach increases circuit complexity and reduces the sink's output impedance.

Figure 2 shows a better approach, which adds a differential amplifier, IC_{2}, and resistors R_{6} through R_{9} to measure Q_{1}'s base current by sampling the voltage across R_{2}. Resistors R_{4} and R_{5} scale and sum the error and reference voltages you apply to differential amplifier IC_{1}. Because IC_{1}'s inverting input connects to current-shunt resistor R_{1}'s upper end and not to ground, the reference voltage, V_{REF}, determines the error voltage applied to Q_{1}, preserving output scaling and allowing output-current calculation as V_{REF}/R_{1}. As a result, the regulated voltage across R_{1} represents the sum of the desired output current plus the transistor's base current. Because the transistor inherently "subtracts" its base current, its collector current and, hence, the output current have no base-current error.

**Figure 2** Adding base-current error compensation improves the circuit’s performance. Using perfectly matched resistors simplifies the output-current equation to I_{OUT}=(V_{REF}/R_{1}).

You can simplify the circuit and preserve its error-correction properties by combining IC_{1} and IC_{2}; better yet, you can add two resistors to Figure 1 to achieve the same effect. Figure 3 shows the final circuit. To understand its operation, think of the circuit as a voltage regulator that delivers a voltage equal to V_{REF} across R_{1}. If you short-circuit base resistor R_{2}, note that any common-mode error that resistors R_{5} and R_{6} introduce cancels and thus has no effect on Q_{1}'s base voltage. When you feed the voltage drop back to IC_{1}'s input through R_{5} and R_{4}, the voltage drop across R_{2}, representing Q_{1}'s base current, increases the regulated voltage across R_{1} by the ratio of R_{5}/R_{4}. If the ratio of R_{5}/R_{4} equals that of R_{2}/R_{1}, the voltage across R_{1} includes an error term that effectively cancels the base current. If R_{3}=R_{4} and R_{5}=R_{6}, the following **equation** describes the output current, I_{OUT}:

Because the base current, I_{B}, appears twice with opposite signs and cancels, the equation simplifies to: I_{OUT}=(V_{REF}/R_{1}).

**Figure 3** You can further simplify the current sink’s design by adding only two resistors, R_{5} and R_{6}, to the original in Figure 1. The output-current equation remains I_{OUT}=(V_{REF}/R_{1}), as in Figure 2.

To optimize the circuit's performance, use the following resistor ratios: R_{2}/R_{1}=R_{5}/R_{4}, R_{5}=R_{6}, R_{3}=R_{4}, R_{5}>>R_{4}, and R_{3}>>R_{1}. Using standard 1%-tolerance resistors in the circuit of Figure 3 reduces the error from Q_{1}'s base current to about one-one-hundredth of its uncompensated level. Without compensation, a low-gain power transistor with a typical current gain of 25 at Q_{1} would introduce a full-scale current error of 4%. The circuit corrects the error to 0.04% and raises Q_{1}'s current gain to an effective current gain of 2500. Perfect matching would result in an immeasurably small base-current error. Note that IC_{1}'s input common-mode-voltage range must include the negative-supply-voltage rail. Equal resistances at both of IC_{1}'s inputs balance the op amp's input-bias currents. The minimum power-supply voltage depends on IC_{1}'s maximum current-sourcing capability and on the sum of the worst-case voltage drops across Q_{1}'s base-emitter junction, R_{1} and R_{2}. The circuit's maximum output current depends on Q_{1}'s worst-case minimum current gain times IC_{1}'s worst-case minimum output current.

To ensure stable operation, use a unity-gain-stable op amp for IC_{1}. When the circuit operates within its nominal current range, an op amp whose response time is substantially longer than Q_{1}'s generally doesn't require installation of compensation capacitor C_{COMP}. However, a small capacitor of a few tens of picofarads guarantees stability under all conditions—for example, when the circuit's output current and the feedback voltage across R_{1} approach zero.

The circuit in Figure 3 works equally well if you use a Darlington transistor for Q_{1} because its higher current gain further improves the circuit's operation. If you use two discrete bipolar transistors, you can improve the composite Darlington transistor's turn-off time by connecting a resistor between the output transistor's base and emitter to remove its excess base charge (Figure 4).

**Figure 4** Adding R_{SPEEDUP} improves the performance of a two-transistor Darlington output stage.

You can use either a fixed or an adjustable reference-voltage source, but for the smallest possible error, the reference source's output impedance should be fairly low to sink feedback current from R_{4}. You can also proportionally increase the values of resistors R_{3} through R_{6} to reduce the amount of current that the reference source absorbs. It's amazing what you can achieve by adding only two resistors to an already-simple circuit.

Body diodes simplify UPS & energy recovery circuits

8 alternative ways to power a laptop

AC-power your circuit without a transformer

Bi-directional DC/DC power supplies: Which way do we go?

Teardown: The power inverter - from sunlight to power grid

Latching power switch uses momentary pushbutton

Class D audio power amplifiers: Adding punch to your sound design

Testing a power supply (Part 1)

Currently no items

## Almost Done

Please confirm the information below before signing in.

{* #socialRegistrationForm *} {* firstName *} {* lastName *} {* displayName *} {* emailAddress *} {* addressCountry *} {* companyName *} {* ednembJobfunction *} {* jobFunctionOther *} {* ednembIndustry *} {* industryOther *}