Analyst Loring Wirbel covers programmable logic from an application perspective, providing a sneak peek at the vertical applications that help drive FPGA complexity, performance, and density. The blog will feature videos allowing engineers to spotlight their latest designs, along with news of products and corporate trends at FPGA vendors and the developers of third-party tools for programmable logic.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Gene sequencing on the Virtex-5

Oct 28 2009 9:15AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (2) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


And now for something completely different: According to the online genome-sequencing news site, Sequence, Stone Ridge Technology Inc. of Bel Air, MD has been awarded $150,000 from the National Science Foundation for a 2010 study of using reconfigurability in a bioinformatics test to perform first-stage alignment and mapping in gene-sequencing studies. Stone Ridge believes that by implementing an open-source dedicated algorithm on dual FPGAs, a PCI Express board would be able to perform first-stage sequencing 50 to 100 times faster than hardware based on a standard integer CPU.

While Stone Ridge has not indicated how closely the special-purpose platform will resemble its standard reconfigurable single-board computer, the company’s RDX-11 is based on a PCI Express card with three Virtex-5 FPGAs. The decision to seek grants in vertical markets such as molecular biology is a smart one. The last decade of start-and-stop experiments with reconfigurable platforms shows that users are still a little uncertain as to how to optimize reconfigurable hardware. But if hardware developers use a common, FPGA-based platform to develop a number of single-purpose vertical single-board computers, reconfigurability will gain popularity through indirect means. Kudos to Stone Ridge, and we would not be surprised to find other small companies follow this route.

Reader Comments



at 10/28/2009 1:35:13 PM, AndyT said:
I hate to play semantics with you Loring, but there is a very distinctive and significant difference between "configurable" (which, methinks, sounds like this app is) for a specific app vs "reconfigurable" which implies the equivalent of on-the-fly, real-time, context switching.



at 10/29/2009 11:45:55 AM, Loring said:
Sorry, what I meant to say was that they originally positioned the RDX-11 board for true reconfigurability, but that the company seems to be aiming for single-use configurability using the same architecture. Half the problem with reconfigurability is that many potential users have never taken advantage of the tools available (which in many cases are incomplete).

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites