Analyst Loring Wirbel covers programmable logic from an application perspective, providing a sneak peek at the vertical applications that help drive FPGA complexity, performance, and density. The blog will feature videos allowing engineers to spotlight their latest designs, along with news of products and corporate trends at FPGA vendors and the developers of third-party tools for programmable logic.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

A tale of two conferences

Oct 21 2009 8:53AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (5) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


Our last blog item mentioned the ARM TechCon3 conference taking place this week, but there are two other significant conferences going on, Supercomm in Chicago and Milcom in Boston. At both conferences, Altera Corp. is promoting its shipment of Stratix devices with 11-Gbit transceivers. In theory, both target OEM audiences could make equal use of higher-end FPGAs. In practice, the fortunes of the former are more suspect than the mil-aero business, even given the downsizing the latter may experience after the booming Bush years.

The problem all major FPGA players could experience as their devices to serve 10-, 40-, and 100-Gbit Ethernet come to market, is the contraction of potential applications to the enterprise market. Supercomm is a show targeting service providers and the equipment manufacturers who serve them. The landscape is not pretty. Ciena has swallowed up the last remnants of Nortel, Alcatel-Lucent and Nokia Siemens Networks struggle to keep up with new Asian players like Huawei and ZTE, and even the mighty Cisco Systems seems to be playing “anything but telco” these days.  OEMs are particularly worried that major carriers are not participating in the federal broadband stimulus program, which means no switching or routing gravy trains in the near term.

Altera, as well as military specialist Actel, seems to be placing more emphasis on Milcom, with special crypto and signal-processing demonstrations. Even in an era of troop drawdowns, the expansion of FPGA subsystems in UAVs and communication platforms seem to indicate a continuing market.

I’m hoping that products like the Altera Stratix IV GT and Xilinx’s Virtex-6 HXT can find near-term homes in the 10-Gbit network interface cards used in high-performance computing and enterprise server clusters. Not so long ago, I thought they’d show up in metropolitan carrier networks too. But with Supercomm moving to more software and services content, maybe it would behoove FPGA vendors to spend more time at Milcom, as well as enterprise and storage shows. Sometimes it gets hard to remember that a service-provider OEM equipment market even exists.

 

Reader Comments



at 10/21/2009 1:57:54 PM, desert rat said:
Supercomm? Is that the combination of 3-4 failed telecom shows into the next big failed telecom show? Why would anyone go to a telecom show? Telecom is dead! Don't believe me? All the Nortel retirees are threatening to riot if they don't get their pension checks and health insurance coverage. There's little value in those old Nortel assets, just enough to pay the lawyers to handle the liquidation. Seems that the management of Nortel says the company owes them MILLIONS in bonuses before any retirees get paid. The IRS says Nortel owes them a few Billion in back taxes. Then, ATT lays off-off another 2500 people last week (14,000 YTD), and is predicted to be the next GM (bankruptcy) in the next 24 months. Verizon is the next Chrysler. Both companies have more pension and healthcare obligations than GM had. Nokia has fallen from grace (along with Ericsson), and they are both teetering on the edge of insignificance. Alcatel-Lucent is already insignificant. All that leads me to ask.... "Why would anyone go to a telecom show?" For the insignificance?



at 10/22/2009 10:14:12 AM, Loring said:
That's all true, but it's something we should be concerned about, not gloat about. Yes, there was a significant fiber overbuild in 1998-2000, but even if we can use dark fiber in the ground for the next couple decades, we still need an updated switching and routing infrastructure.

New 40G and 100G networks cannot be sustained by enterprise clusters alone. Sooner or later, the HPC centers will need to be connected over the long haul, and that long-haul network needs to be upgraded to terabit-nets, not just 100G nets.

The belief that the broadband infrastructure will somehow take care of itself in the aftermath of all major carriers going bankrupt, is akin to thinking a turn to "smart grids" will end the need for high-voltage electrical transmission lines. I see this blithe attitude particularly among broadband wireless handset users. They don't seem to realize that wireless video still requires wireline transport somewhere in the network. If an alternative service-provider network is not created on the ashes of the old, it gives the excuse for the government to step in - and who wants that?



at 10/22/2009 1:37:28 PM, desert rat said:
SimpleSignal and Alteva are already bypassing the old POTS system and the present carriers with VOIP. I am not gloating. I am CONDEMNING the telecom equipment providers and carriers. They are all Neanderthals and they are anachronistic. It's time we buried all of them and moved on to advanced communications techniques without all the legacy garbage. We need to nuke the present telecom system (and the present players) and start over. We can start by watching Supercomm fail. Any money spent on the present system, with the present carriers, is lost money. More of these suppliers and carriers will follow Nortel into financial oblivion soon. I say lets just nuke them all and get it over with, and start building an IP and RF based comm system of the future. What we have now sucks, and is too connected to the idiot legacy carriers.



at 10/22/2009 1:58:49 PM, Loring said:
I have three letters for you - A-T-M. The dream of starting with a clean slate and no legacy infrastructure. It flopped because legacy will always be there whether we want it or not. As long as it exists, people will want to use last-mile copper, dark fiber, etc. Even if all carriers go bankrupt, the desire to reuse will always exist.



at 10/23/2009 5:06:40 PM, Andy T said:
Verizon FIOS was (announced in 2007, immediately after which I cracked my GT proposal over some stubborn "follower" skulls at Altera) and I believe still is going to 100GE in 2010. AT&T had to follow suit and pull their 100GE rollout closer to that date. Equipment providers scrambled to deliver programs to the buildout. Xilinx got caught flat-footed, as they had difficulty routing the 100GE FPGA datapath as well as hitting the necessary offchip memory bandwidths. Altera just announced production of GT. 'nuff said.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites