Analyst Loring Wirbel covers programmable logic from an application perspective, providing a sneak peek at the vertical applications that help drive FPGA complexity, performance, and density. The blog will feature videos allowing engineers to spotlight their latest designs, along with news of products and corporate trends at FPGA vendors and the developers of third-party tools for programmable logic.

Friday, June 19, 2009

Whither the rad-tolerant FPGA?

Jun 19 2009 8:31AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (3) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


Actel Corp. has upgraded its RTAX family of radiation-tolerant FPGAs, adding the S and SL series with greatly reduced power and higher speed.  Actel is positioning RTAX as a primary space-flight programmable architecture, at a time when the space industry is going through some interesting hiccups. The balance among military, civilian, and commercial architectures in space is in flux, and the relative fortunes of commercial orbital imaging vs. intelligence and communication satellites are still very uncertain.   Will FPGAs like the RTAX end up being used more in near-space UAV drones and space planes than in satellites? Here’s the rundown.

In the Rumsfeld era, any military satellite deemed marginally necessary was approved for prototyping. The spooks had Future Imagery Architecture and Integrated Overhead SIGINT Architecture, while the broadband DoD jocks had the Transformational Satellite System, or T-SAT. FIA and IOSA fell victim to budget cuts in the second Bush administration, while T-SAT met its inglorious end in early spring.

Now, Obama chaired a panel on the Next-Generation Electro-Optical System satellites, under which Lockheed will serve as prime contractor for something easier to build than FIA. Intelligence director Dennis Blair also has called for more Pentagon use of commercial systems like DigitalGlobe and GeoEye.

In theory, this represents a good opportunity for RTAX, but in practice, both the government-built and government-leased satellites are only a portion of what was planned ten years ago. Since there are so many launch startups like SpaceX working from privatized space ports, will this mean a new round of private satellites?  Nice idea, but based on the fact that Iridium and DigitalGlobe had to end up selling most of their capacities to the government due to soft commercial demand, I would think that investors will be reticent to plow more money into the private space industry.

This leaves the interesting question of how high in the atmosphere rad-tolerant FPGAs will be required. Low-altitude UAVs already are a prime socket for FPGAs, and if follow-ons to the Global Hawk move to near-space altitudes approaching the U2, this could be an interesting realm where the RTAX FPGA is a candidate. We also should be aware of continuing “space plane” prototypes from the Pentagon’s Falcon program. In any event, this is not your father’s orbital space – not by a long shot.

 

Reader Comments



at 6/19/2009 2:33:38 PM, desert rat said:
Yes, many MIL apps are going to FPGAs, if for no other reason than to get off the short life cycle curves of the commodity chipmaker mentality. And yes, many MIL apps are in Aero, and need rad-hard qual. It aint so much about altitude as it is about surviving a nuclear burst and be able to accomplish the mission afterwards. That is why all MIL fiber connections in Aero must use glass fiber (plastic fiber will go opaque and not pass light after an EMP hits it).

BTW, new nomenclature on this topic coming up: it's not Rad-tolerant anymore. Since the telecom industry is putting out so much deadly radiation these days (in the form of red ink and junk services), the new term is "telecom-tolerant"...



at 6/19/2009 3:32:30 PM, desert rat said:
Also...when you get to high altitudes, radiation is only one of your problems. You gotta outgas your semi devices and components (no gas bubbles inside the semi device, or the top pops-off at very low atmospheric pressures...or in vacuums). You could hermetically enclose the semi devices in a can. If you enclose them in a can to protect from low pressures, you can do the radiation shielding at the same time. Also, at high altitudes, there ain't enough air molecules up there to do air cooling, so you have to liquid-cool or conduction-cool hot chips. That is done with the can too. There is more to it than just radiation tolerance for high-altitude apps...

At 60K feet, a pilot without a space suit will endure some interesting phenomena. First, his blood will boil at low pressure, releasing all the dissolved gasses. He will start to swell-up (as the gases are released from the tissues and the blood). And then, his eyeballs will blow-out (to release the pressure from the gases). These reactions are similar to what we are seeing in telecom companies today....as they react to the very low atmospheric pressure in that biz...



at 6/22/2009 8:26:32 AM, Loring Wirbel said:
If you look at the business plans of most mil-aero primes, they are aiming for space-based use of rad-tolerant, under the perhaps naive assumption that surviving nuclear bursts is a less-likely scenario these days. What with mullah-vs-mullah struggles in Iran and North Korea looking to Hawaii for the 4th of July, those assumptions may not work any more.

But for utilization of rad-tolerant in space, you are right about some concepts of micro-satellites and very simplistic 50kfeet+ UAVs not taking into account performance issues like outgassing. Gil Klinger and Pedro Rustan made careers in the NRO out of telling the space spooks "smaller means simpler," when it ain't necessarily so.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites