Analyst Loring Wirbel covers programmable logic from an application perspective, providing a sneak peek at the vertical applications that help drive FPGA complexity, performance, and density. The blog will feature videos allowing engineers to spotlight their latest designs, along with news of products and corporate trends at FPGA vendors and the developers of third-party tools for programmable logic.

Monday, October 19, 2009

Over-interpreting the extended ARM

Oct 19 2009 8:56AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (2) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


At first glance, the new Xilinx announcement on extending ARM licensing to include Cortex, as well as embedded memories and AMBA communication peripherals, would seem to be a PR challenge to Altera taking the form of “Anything MIPS can do, ARM can do better.” We’ve already talked about ARM dominance in the FPGA world in a previous column.  It's fair to say that Xilinx sees its Power license as limited, and wants to join the dominant RISC team.  It's also important to point out that Xilinx has worked with ARM in the past, albeit not in direct core integration.

But something slightly different is occupying my mind today. Analysts and journalists seem to be hyper-sensitized to any expansion of the ARM kingdom, whether it's a new licensee or an expansion of an old licensing pact. When Broadcom Corp. signed a multicore ARM pact a couple weeks ago, outsiders were certain the action spoke volumes about the company’s intent to become more aggressive in handheld devices.  Only a few days ago, analysts began speculating about NXP Semiconductors Inc.'s intent to combine two types of ARM cores in future devices.

But if we look at historic licensing deals in Sparc, MIPS, Power, etc., we find that most licensees want to follow the developer of the instruction set down paths of greater complexity and more features. This is not a necessary indication that those features will be put to immediate use, it’s merely a sign that the licensee wants to have a full portfolio, and be seen as a full-line supplier. Xilinx benefits by licensing Cortex and working with ARM on AMBA, to be sure, but let’s not over-analyze this. As Freud once said (or maybe not), “Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.”

But sometimes an ARM license gets exaggerated in significance when certain instruction-set originators are opening technical conferences that day. Not that there’s anything wrong with talking up a Cortex license as the ARM TechCon3 conference opens. But poor Tensilica launches a new architecture, the Xtensa 8, on the same day, and gets stampeded by all the ARM minutae.

 

Reader Comments



at 10/19/2009 4:07:29 PM, The Captain said:
I would agree with Loring that Xilinx is only jumping on the "Cortex PR bandwagon" in an effort to say "we can do that too!"
They really only want their customers to use their free microBlaze core (not available for ASICs) to keep them in their expensive, power hungry FPGAs as long as they can.
Of note is "the next-generation ARM® AMBA® interconnect technology that is enhanced and optimized for FPGA architectures" which means they have a performance issue in FPGAs they are trying to fix. If they can, it means more competition from FPGAs on the standard product offering in markets that can bear the price and size, but not mobile, which plays against ARM's strength. So maybe this is ARM's way on getting leg (or arm) up on Intel. I don't think you will ever see an Atom processor in an FPGA!
I would also add that if you want to prototype (the best use of FPGAs) an ARM SoC, that it's always beter to use a real hardened core in MCUs already on the market.



at 10/21/2009 2:04:42 PM, desert rat said:
The world is looking for any viable alternative they can find to avoid Intel (Atom) and Microsoft (freedom from ANY Microsoft code). Both Intel and Microsoft have seen their best days. They will not be significant players in the upcoming MID/smartphone/netbook trend. Everyone wants to deal with ARM because there are already over 200 licenses out there for over 500 different products. Never spit against the wind....

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites