A reader asks what the difference is between trade secrets and patents, and whether trade secrets are ever formally documented. Our expert, H. Henry Heines of Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, offers a primer on trade secrets and provides in-depth answers.
Expert Analysis: The ITC can prohibit the importation and sale of products that infringe a US patent. Most electronic devices are manufactured outside the United States, so the potential power of the ITC is very real and worth understanding.
If a company in a country that doesn't recognize IP rights copies your IP, what's your recourse? Our expert responds.
A reader has an idea for a new product, and creates it with materials from two different companies. He doesn't work for either—is he the inventor? Our expert weighs in.
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 has broad bipartisan support. But there is conflict within the high tech industry on the proposed changes—some of it centering on a David versus Goliath storyline.
Companies turning to design reuse and intellectual-property blocks need to make sure that third-party IP fits easily into the target SOC environment.
A reader wonders what kind of a track record the US court system has in general when it comes to IP theft suits. Our expert weighs in.
A reader wants to know how Software as a Service businesses can protect their proprietary business processes. Our expert weighs in.
You have a new invention and are considering filing a patent. The question is, does it make sense to file? You need to weigh several complicated factors to make a good decision.
If integrators want to minimize their risk in using a particular IP core and shorten their product development cycle, they need to understand the IP ecosystem.
When you file and where you file a patent can make the difference between benefiting from patent rights and being an also-ran.
Several significant changes in rapid succession favor patent defendants and significantly diminish the fearsome power of patents.
A lab notebook may be a nuisance to keep, but in today's climate of patent challenges and infringement claims, it can be an invaluable piece of legal evidence. Here are some surefire procedures you can follow to keep a notebook that will stand up in court.
The following is a chapter excerpted from the book Patents For Business: A Manager's Guide to Scope, Strategy, and Due Diligence, by M. Henry Heines, partner, Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP.
In the recent case of KSR v. Teleflex, the U.S. Supreme Court has redefined the standard of what is too obvious to patent. Patent attorneys will soon be responding with some new strategies. Let’s take a look at what to expect.
A recent article covered the lawsuit brought by Washington Research Foundation (WRF) against consumer electronics firms that were using Cambridge Silicon Radio’s Bluetooth chips. A reader asks, if what it did is not illegal, is Broadcom guilty of unethical practices?
The Supreme Court and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) both made significant announcements on April 30 concerning patents that have implications for the electronics industry.
In Part 1 of “David vs. Goliath: The battle between large and small IP vendors” we talked about some of the general differences between IP providers based on their size. Part 2 looks at how the characteristics of your company and the specific SoC you are designing may influence your decision on whether to purchase IP from a large or small IP vendor.
As in many other industries, the controversy between large versus small suppliers for a needed system component also applies to the selling and buying of silicon IP for SoC designs. The difference is that the unique nature of silicon IP makes for an interesting analysis when considering who you should go to for your IP.
Eliminating all risk associated with integrating an IP core onto a piece of silicon is a nice thought, but it's not possible. But if you make the right decisions at the beginning of your design, you can substantially reduce the risk associated with integrating silicon IP into your chip.