Monday, October 27, 2008
TSMC Roadmap, DRAM Timing and Sematech Highlights
The Semiconductor International server told me that this is blog # 50 of Perspectives From the Leading Edge [PFTLE]. Since readership continues to grow, I can only assume my focus on 3D IC integration (for the most part) meets with your approval. Hopefully the information that’s shared here is helping you stay on top of this rapidly changing area. Thanks to Semi Int for supporting me in this effort and you, the readers, for coming back every week to these pages.
Before I get to the promised review of last months Sematech 3D IC workshop, I will share some new information on some past topics.
TSMC Roadmap
In the past we have mentioned the TSMC “roadmap” for TSV. [ PFTLE “Foundry TSVs are a comin’ – TSMC makes a play for a bigger portion of the pie” 5/2/2008 ] I asked whether any of you readers had a copy of it and one of you finally came up with it for me. Below is the same roadmap that TSMC shared at the recent Semicon West meeting. “IT17” will be their vias first technology which they indicate would initially be made available on 17 um pitch. The PT 140 and PT 60 generations are vias last technologies, so we can safely assume that the vias first technology is not ready yet. This matches information that PFTLE has gotten that TSMC is still looking at vias first options and deciding on the best way to go. Since the technology decision has not been made yet, I would not be surprised to see this pushed back to 2012.
![]()
More on Memory
Secondly, the site DRAM exchange has just (Oct 21st) posted some important info tied to last weeks blog [ PFTLE “ Memory Market Headed South...Will SSDs Lead the Recovery ?” Oct 19th 2008] .
The following are key points as to when DRAM will move to TSV stacking:
- Intel 45nm CPU “Nehalem" (Core i7) will release in November of 2008
- Current North Bridge & P45 chipsets allow PC makers to choose DDR2 or DDR3 and most users have chosen the lower cost DDR2
- Core i7 will support only the DDR3 standard which will provide a strong push for DDR3
- but....Core i7 initially will be positioned for high end products and, DDR3 penetration in DRAM market will thus be limited
- Market should begin to adopt Core i7 in late 2009, but the economy will probably delay this into 2010
- Adoption of DDR3 will depend on the price difference between DDR3 and DDR2 not when DDR3 chipsets are made available
As you may recall from previous blogs [ i.e. PFTLE “Road Trip Revelations” 5/18/2008] when signal speed requirements of 1333 and 1600 Mbps for DDR3 and DDR4 are reached current packaging will not be able to deliver. So, it looks like my projection that 3D TSV DRAM will start (note I said start and not some double digit penetration of the DRAM market) sometime in 2010 has some support.
Highlights from Sematech Workshop
Now some highlights from the Sematech workshop “Manufacturing and Reliability Challenges for 3D ICs using TSVs” which was held Sept 25th-26th in conjunction with the Advanced Metals Conference.
“Unfluorinated MO-CVD Cu Precursors…” – Air Products
The use of OMCVD precursor for Cu seed deposition in 3D IC technology has been described previously.[ for example see P. Ramm et. al. “Interchip Via Technology by Using Cu for Vertical System Integration”, 2001 Adv. Metals Conf.] . The organometallic precursor material is usually Cupraselect™ from Air Products [(hfac)Cu(VTMS), where hfac = fluorinated beta diketonate functionality and vtms = vinyltrimethylsilane ] or Gigacopper™ from Merck [(hfac)Cu(MHY) where MHY=2-methyl-1-hexen-3-yne ]. While the technique produces highly conformal and excellent resistivity copper seed, it is generally viewed as suffering from the high cost of the deposition equipment, the slow deposition rates and the high cost of the OM precursor materials.
The Air Products group in Carlsbad CA points out that the fluorinated groups in both of these precursors : (a) cause unnecessary cost, (b) could cause adhesion issues due to the heavy fluorine content (think Teflon) and (c) can at most result in 50% copper deposition yield because they are based on disproportionation reaction chemistry [ 2Cu(+1) → Cu (metal) + Cu (+2) ] .
To overcome these issues they have developed a new precursor, “K15”, which is non fluorinated and can deposit 100% of the copper it contains, since it’s deposition is based on reduction chemistry. I’ll spare you the chemical structure. A liquid at 65 °C it results in a high VP of precursor and is reduced by formic acid in the feed stream. At 250 °C copper can be grown on TiN at 150 nm/min .
For those who are looking at OMCVD Cu in their 3D IC process, this is probably worth a look.
“….TSV Metallization based on Electrografted Copper…” Alchimer
Alchimer certainly has gotten their share of hype recently for their electrografted Cu technology [ see PFTLE “3D Integration Stays Hot at Semicon West”, Aug 13th 2008 ] . Alchimer, which spun out of CEA Leti several years ago, is a “develop and license” technology company. Their Cu seed deposition technology “eG ViaCoat” is based on a biased surface initiating “grafting” to semiconducting surfaces surface. The copper (as shown in the figure below) is highly conformal and has no trouble coating very high aspect ratio vias. As you know I’m not a fan of the high AR vias (for the next 5+ years), but I see more applicability for their technology package than just high AR vias.
For eG ViaCoat they have shown low copper resistance and compatibility with standard electroplating processes and CMP processing.
![]()
Alchimer quickly understood that a technique to deposit Cu seed was of limited value if the practitioner still had to deposit TiN barrier/adhesion layer by another technique. Alchimer has thus developed a barrier deposition process [ “cG” – for chemical graft ] to compliment their copper process. The latter is expected on the market in 2009. To take things one step further, and lock up the whole via filling process, they have also developed a chemical graft insulation process. Their full via fill process is known as “AquiVia” I think this overall process can have potential impact on generic TSV filling irrespective of aspect ratio. Having said that I’d like to see more information on the composition of the insulation layer. From the description of the chemistry I have to assume that this is an organic layer, and , as such, I have questions on thermal stability, metal migration etc. that I will try to answer for you in the future.
“High Speed Copper Filling….” - Ebara
Ebara, a Japanese giant in electroplating technology, gave a nice presentation on their copper plating technologies for TSV filling. An interesting plating time vs via size slide from their presentation is shown below. Although this should be intuitive, it clearly shows that for a given via depth the larger via diameters take longer to fill.
![]()
“Die Cavity Integration for TSV Stacking” IBM
We have seen the use of a template to help speed up die to wafer 3D IC assembly before [ PFTLE “ 3D Road Tour contd”, May 28th 2008 ] from Tezzaron.
In this presentation by IBM Tokyo Labs, we see the possible next level of integration where several die are stacked in a template and bonded all at once ( see fig below). Very clever idea, for which I’m sure they have filed for patents !
![]()
For all the latest on 3D IC Integration stay linked to Perspectives From the Leading Edge……………
© Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
